MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W239186926

Richard Hooker: Prophet of Anglicanism

2001· article· en· W239186926 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fredrica Harris Thompsett

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnglican and Episcopal history · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueScottish History and National Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyIncarnationAsidePortraitDoctrineHistoryClassicsArchbishopPhilosophyReligious studiesSubject (documents)PoliticsArt historyTheologyLiteratureLawArtPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

PHILIP B. SECOR. Richard Hooker: Prophet of Tunbridge Wells, Kent: Burns & Oates; and Toronto, Ontario: The Anglican Book Centre, 1999. Pp. xxii +362, bibliography, index. $37.95. This is not a critical, scholarly biography of Richard Hooker. What Philip Secor attempts is a general and at breezy and times approach supposedly designed for non-specialist readers. Yet even in this regard, it is flawed. Certainly Secor's subject is a worthy one and a modern biography is long overdue. Richard Hooker (1554-1600), one of the most important figures in Anglican history, was the leading constructive theologian and apologist of what Secor aptly calls emerging Anglicanism. Secor does correct and largely sets aside Izaak Walton's 1665 hagiographic treatment of Hooker. We can be grateful that secor's portrait adds incarnational substance both to a theologian whose sacramental vision was rooted in the doctrine of the Incarnation and to a life that has often been misunderstood or glimpsed only in scanty sources. The spirit of the man presented by secor mirrors the brilliant, widely-informed, tolerant, and persuasive characteristics that mark Hooker's writings. For the general reader, scenes of daily life and religious politics are descriptively well set, replete with the sights, sounds and smells of Hooker's Exeter, Oxford and London (along with maps drawn by the author). Secor seemingly addresses every available detail from Hooker's birth and childhood through his death and the ensuing debacles over his written remains. Those with significant influence on Hooker as well as on the course of the Reformation in England-John Jewel, Bishop Edwin Sandys and his son (also named Edwin), John Rainolds, John Whitgift, and Walter Travers (Hooker's cousin and famous rival at the Temple church)-are introduced. The reputation of Hooker's falsely-maligned wife is restored in a chapter entitled, A Judicious Marriage. Colored and other photographs of leading Elizabethan churchmen and of churches known or served by Hooker are included. Seemingly no expense has been spared in bringing Hooker's to life in this general biography. Any modern biographer of Hooker has the advantage of using the Folger Library modern critical edition of Hooker's Works, whose general editor, W. Speed Hill, contributes a foreword to this biography. Secor keys those texts from Hooker that he does cite directly both to John Keble's nineteenth-century edition and to this critical, more complete, and multi-volume corpus. Secor learns from and usually follows the conclusions and textual histories of the Folger's superb editors. He concurs, for example, with William Haagaard and others that Hooker's motivation for writing his constructive and apologetic theology for the Church of England, The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, came first from within himself (p. 233). Secor's discussion of the Laws, as we might expect from a political scientist, highlights the theological treatments of law and society in Book I. He does refer to recent scholarship by John Booty and others in presenting Book V, Hooker's brilliant exposition of faith and practice. On the controversial text of Book VII, where the authority of bishops is addressed, Secor follows recent scholarship pointing toward the influence of Adrian Savaria, a prominent Dutch theologian and Calvinist who was supportive of episcopacy. Hooker's life may have been neglected, but fortunately for those of us who are heirs of the Reformation church in England, Hooker's writings have not been. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,607
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,167 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnglican and Episcopal historyMême sujetScottish History and National IdentityTravaux en français237 207