MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2394025303 · doi:10.1353/cri.2016.0023

Mr. Selden’s Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of a Vanished Cartographer by Timothy Brook

2016· article· en· W2394025303 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Fang

Notice bibliographique

RevueChina review international · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePhilippine History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChinaOrientalismHistoryArt historyCartographyGeographyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Mr. Selden’s Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of a Vanished Cartographer by Timothy Brook Jun Fang (bio) Timothy Brook. Mr. Selden’s Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of a Vanished Cartographer. Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2013. xxiv, 211 pp. Hardcover $29.95, isbn 978-177089-353-5. This captivating book is composed of eight chapters and an epilogue. Chapter 1, “What’s Wrong with This Map?” introduces the English legalist and Orientalist [End Page 291] John Selden (1584–1654) and a map of China and the South China Sea that he owned. Chapter 2, “Closing the Sea,” examines Selden’s theories of the high seas, which aver that in addition to land a state may also possess seas and oceans. Chapter 3, “Reading Chinese in Oxford,” discusses the study of the Selden map by Thomas Hyde (1636–1703), the keeper of the Bodleian Library at Oxford, and his Chinese guest Michael Shen (c. 1658–1691). The chapter further concerns Europe’s interest in Orientalism in the second half of the seventeenth century. Chapter 4, “John Saris and the China Captain,” looks at the trade competition in Asia between England and the Netherlands. The relevance of this chapter to the Selden map is established by the fact that John Saris (d. 1643), the chief English merchant in Japan, brought the Chinese map to London. Chapter 5, “The Compass Rose,” speculates that the cartographer of the Selden map possessed prior knowledge of the European navigation maps. Chapter 6, “Sailing from China,” examines the map in detail and identifies a number of placenames in the Selden map, and chapter 7, “Heaven Is Round, Earth Is Square,” assesses the strengths and shortcomings of various maps of China produced in Europe and Asia prior to the Selden map. The last chapter, “Secrets of the Selden Map,” is the essential part of the book. It reveals four “secrets” of the map based on the discussions in the preceding chapters: first, China occupies a prominent place in the map and is provided with more geographical details than any other region included in the map; second, the map is made with stunning accuracy and its scale mapping was equal to the best contemporary cartography; third, the route information on the Selden map has been coded to reflect the position of magnetic north at the time it was drawn; fourth, the map serves as a commercial navigation chart which was not drawn to demonstrate any claims of sovereignty over what lay out in the sea. The epilogue, “Resting Places,” concludes that during the first half of the seventeenth century the Selden map was the most accurate chart of the South China Sea in existence. There had never been a better map, and for another four decades there would not be another. Yet from the larger perspective of the history of cartography, the Selden map never had the chance to make a difference. Selden’s Map is a scholarly work of superb quality. Its logical structure is well reflected by the sequence of the chapters. Its profound analysis of the issues related to the Selden map is reinforced by the author’s formidable knowledge of the history and cartography in both China and Europe, and his impressive attention to minute details. Written by a renowned historian who also enjoys the reputation of a wordsmith, this book maintains Brook’s usual standard of elegant writing and lucid presentation. There is hardly anything in this book with which to disagree. I only want to raise a minor issue arising from the author’s discussion of Selden’s articulation of The Closed Sea and his map. It seems that Brook shares the misinterpretation of China’s official position on the South China Sea as in chapter 1 he mentions [End Page 292] numerous times that China claims most of the South China Sea. For example, on pages 3–4, he writes that “this large and relatively shallow body of water south of China is bounded on its other three sides by Vietnam, Malaysian Borneo, Brunei and the Philippines. China has declared ownership of the whole thing, minus the standard 12 nautical miles (13.8 miles or 22...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,769
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChina review internationalMême sujetPhilippine History and CultureTravaux en français237 207