Hidden agendas: how journalists influence the news
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hidden Agendas: How Journalists Influence the News. Lydia Miljan and Barry Cooper. Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press, 2003. 212 pp. $24.95 pbk. The debate over media bias is largely driven by political perspective. Those on the far right tend to see liberal media promoting special interests and dedicated to the perpetuation of Big Government. Those on the far left are just as convinced that the media are cheerleaders for unregulated capitalism on behalf of Big Business. Hidden Agendas, offering empirical research on this controversy from Canada, obviously comes from the far right politically. In making their case that left-leaning journalists influence the news, however, its authors engage less in scholarship than in ideology. Worse, they practice questionable science in order to make their political points. As result Hidden Agendas amounts to little more than polemic and makes little worthwhile contribution to the debate. The authors are political scientists-Miljan teaches at the University of Windsor and Cooper at the University of Calgary. Unlike the journalists they accuse of harboring ulterior motives, they make their agenda obvious from the outset. They believe it is journalists, not owners, who inject bias into the news, and they see that bias as invariably left-leaning, even Marxist. The study's findings, however, can be largely understood in the context of the authors' own perspectives. Miljan has been director since 1987 of the National Media Archive, division of the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute, which is often described as right-wing th ink tank. The survey research relied on was gathered for Miljan's 2000 dissertation in the department where Cooper teaches. Cooper is the author of Sins of Omission, 1994 study of CBC television that found much relevant information to be suppressed by the government broadcaster. Not surprisingly, CBC journalists suffer worst of all from accusations of bias in Hidden Agendas. There are two major problems with this study that render it suspect. The first is that the authors set out with the objective of proving point, and they gathered data designed to do just that. Given the undisguised mission on which the authors embarked, with little pretence of disinterested inquiry, it is fair to conclude that their findings may have largely been determined by their method. In particular, the loaded nature of their survey questions possibly resulted in skewed data. For example, their survey of 270 journalists and 804 members of the general public included such questions as whether communism was evil and unworkable or a good idea but wrecked by bad leadership. Another equated capitalism with both free markets and the right to own private property. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle