Another Measurement of the Elusive Entity Called “Intestinal Function”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Plasma Citrulline: A Marker of Enterocyte Mass in Villous Atrophy-Associated Small Bowel Disease. P Crenin, K Vahedi, A Lavergne-Slove, L Cynober, C Matuchansky, B Messing. Gastroenterology, 2003;124:1210–9 Summary: The authors of the study referenced above found that in adult humans, plasma citrulline concentration correlated well with the extent of villous atrophy as assessed by small bowel (and in some cases, ileal) biopsies. The comparison groups consisted of healthy controls, patients with anorexia nervosa, and patients with other enteropathies without villous atrophy. Using receiver-operator characteristic curves, the authors found that plasma citrulline could distinguish patients with total villous atrophy from those without total villous atrophy and that discrimination was best at a cut-off citrulline concentration of 20 micromol/L (sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.90, positive predictive value 0.88, negative predictive value 0.96, and accuracy 0.92). Furthermore, in patients with celiac disease, citrulline levels normalized during treatment with gluten-free diet. Comment: Enterocytes convert glutamine and other amino acids into citrulline. The kidney then converts citrulline to arginine. In the rat, the responsible enzyme for this conversion, pyrroline-5-caroboxylate synthase, is expressed in the duodenum and jejunum and, to a lesser extent, in the ileum. Therefore, plasma citrulline should be a function of enterocyte mass. As a result of this study, do we now have a justification to use this measurement to identify patients with villous atrophy? I suspect that good clinical judgment and a stool examination for fat are still equally useful as non-specific indicators of mucosal malfunction. Like other similar non-specific markers, plasma citrulline does not reveal the cause of, nor suggest appropriate treatment for, small intestinal injury. A great number of human diseases produce small intestinal mucosal injury. These include inflammatory disorders such as Crohn disease, celiac disease, allergy, graft versus host disease, ischemic bowel disease, short bowel syndrome, toxins or drugs such as chemotherapy or radiation, and many more. Although new technologies such as video capsule and push enteroscopy allow visualization of the small bowel, small bowel functional capacity remains a vague general concept of uncertain clinical significance that is difficult to quantitate. Current tools include measurements of sugar digestion and absorption by breath tests and permeability assays, measurements of fecal fat content, and direct and indirect measurements of protein loss in stool. The potential value of plasma citrulline as I see it, is not to identify individuals with this poorly defined “intestinal insufficiency” but rather to aid in clinical management of selected small bowed disorders and as a research tool. If changes in this biochemical marker of small intestinal injury actually precede clinical features of disease, it may have even more uses. At the moment, however, the authors have studied only adults with established intestinal injury. Such a test might for example help guide the feeding of premature infants while providing an early signal of impending necrotizing enterocolitis. Citrulline levels might alert clinicians to modify therapy to avoid intestinal injury caused by cancer therapy (both radiation and chemotherapy). It might be possible to monitor recovery from inflammatory disorders such as Crohn disease, food allergy or celiac disease, and monitor compliance with a gluten-free diet. Repeated measurements could perhaps assist in defining the extent of deficiency in short bowel syndrome or monitor the intestinal status after small bowel transplantation. These ideas sound hopeful, but the present study does not allow such clinical applications yet. Currently, plasma citrulline is simply an interesting observation with the potential for becoming a clinical tool. It will remain on the sidelines until it can prove itself with reproducible age-related norms and predictable correlations with degree of intestinal injury. Stay tuned as citrulline undergoes further evaluation in the clinical proving ground. Edward J. Hoffenberg MD Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and the Children's Hospital Denver, Colorado
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».