MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2399308995 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.brain15-a46

Abstract A46: Transcriptome analysis on tumor and its normal cerebellar counterpart from mouse models reveals molecular mechanisms underlying evolution of SHH and Group3 medulloblastoma

2015· article· en· W2399308995 sur OpenAlexaff
Xiaochong Wu, Adrian M. Dubuc, William A. Weiss, Robert J. Wechsler‐Reya, Michael D. Taylor

Notice bibliographique

RevueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueRNA modifications and cancer
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedulloblastomaTranscriptomeSonic hedgehogPTCH1BiologyTumor initiationCancer researchGene expression profilingGeneGeneticsMolecular biologyGene expressionCarcinogenesis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Human medulloblastoma (MB) consists of four molecular subgroups. In spite of enormous effort majority of current MB mouse models are SHH subgroup, represented by Patched heterozygous mice (designated as SHH-A). GTML MB is the only published spontaneous Group3 MB mouse model (designated as G3), which was induced by expressing MycN under the regulation of GLT1 promoter. By using Sleeping Beauty transposon system we have created and published two SHH mouse models: Math1SB11/T2Onc/Ptch+/- (designated as SHH-B) and Math1SB11/T2Onc/P53mut (designated as SHH-C). To dissect the molecular mechanism of SHH and Group3 MB during tumor evolution (initiation, maintenance and maturation), we profiled transcriptomes on SHH-A, SHH-B, SHH-C and G3 MBs along with normal mouse cerebellum (CB) of different developmental stage (E15, E18, P0, P60, P95 and P122). Fetal and/or adult human CBs are routinely used as normal controls for human pediatric MBs. One major advantage of profiling mouse tumor samples over human tumor samples is the availability of age-matched normal mouse CB counterparts. This is particularly true in case of developmental diseases such as pediatric MBs. Indeed, our study showed that transcriptomes of normal mouse CB from E15, E18 and P0 (designated as EdCB, representing early developmental CB), are similar to each other but distinct from mouse CB at P60, P95 and P122 (designated as LdCB, representing late developmental CB). Importantly P60 to P120 are the ages at which most of spontaneous MBs are harvested from a tumor-bearing mouse. We therefore analyzed global gene expression level of MBs and EdCB in comparison with LdCB, the mouse MB's normal counterparts. As a developmental disease, MB is presumably initiated from a single cell or a single cell clone that is transformed at an early developmental stage of a normal CB. In fact, it is well known that a SHH MB is initiated from transformation of granule cell precursors at EGL, the external granule layer. However, it is unclear about the initiation of Group3 MB. In this study we showed that compared to a normal LdCB, a particular MB transriptome harbors four major types of abnormally expressed genes: 1. Genes not only specific to one subgroup but also shared with EdCB; representing tumor initiation events. 2. Genes specific to a subgroup only; representing subgroup-specific tumor promotion events. 3. Genes shared not only by both subgroups but also by EdCB, representing non-subgroup specific tumor maintenance events; 4. Genes shared by both subgroups only; representing non-subgroup specific late tumor maturation events. We confirmed that SHH MBs from SHH-A, B, and C are all initiated at Math1/Atoh1 expressing cells, which are further transformed by up-regulation of Olig3 and MycN among other genes. Rxrg-expressing cells are identified as Group3 MB initiating cells, which are further transformed by over-expression of Crx (Otx3) along with other genes such as Otx2, and down-regulation of cerebellum-specific Zic1 and others such as Lgi1. Both subgroups of MBs may be maintained and mature as genes associated with cell cycle, mitosis and chromosome integrity, such as KIFs, CDK1, PLK1/4, AURKA/B, CENP family and MCMs are abnormally overexpressed. Our study reveals distinct molecular mechanisms underlying tumor evolution of SHH and Group3 MBs. We propose a MB evolution model, illustrating how a normal cell at specific cell of origin can be transformed to a fully developed subgroup specific MB. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that despite the fact that they are initiated from distinct cell of origin, different subgroup of MBs do share common abnormal molecular events for tumor maintenance and maturation, suggesting that subgroup specific target therapies alone may be not as effective as their combination with therapies targeting abnormalities common to different subgroup of MBs. Citation Format: Xiaochong Wu, Adrian Dubuc, William A. Weiss, Robert J. Wechsler-Reya, Michael D. Taylor. Transcriptome analysis on tumor and its normal cerebellar counterpart from mouse models reveals molecular mechanisms underlying evolution of SHH and Group3 medulloblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Brain Cancer Research; May 27-30, 2015; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(23 Suppl):Abstract nr A46.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCancer Research→Même sujetRNA modifications and cancer→Travaux en français237 207→