Abstract P2-02-12: Association of inflammatory and tumor markers with circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the association of inflammatory/tumor markers and CTCs in women with progressing metastatic breast cancer prior to commencing a new line of systemic therapy. Methods: From February 2013 to April 2015, 96 patients with metastatic BC about to start a new treatment (due to progression), without current diabetes or use of anti-inflammatory agents, were recruited from four Ontario cancer hospitals. Women provided fasting blood for inflammatory and tumor markers and CTC measurement; CTCs were assayed within 72 hours of collection using CellSearch. Blood was frozen at -80C until assays were performed in a single batch (C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, PAI-1, Ca15-3, Ca125, VEGF, TNFa). Associations of CTCs with blood factors were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients after transforming the variables to normality. For CTCs the transformation log(x+0.5) was used. Associations with categorical variables were tested using one-way analysis of variance. P values <0.05 were significant. Results: Median age of patients was 60.5 years, 87 (90.6%) were post-menopausal, 83 (86.5%) had hormone receptor positive BC, 16 (16.7%) HER2 positive BC, 10 (10.4%) triple negative; 75 (78.1%) grade II/III. At the time of CTC measurement, bone, lung, liver and brain metastases were present in 79%, 44%, 40% and 6% of patients respectively, with 54%, 37%, 35% and 3% having progression at these sites respectively. PAI-1 and CA15-3 exceeded the limit of the assay in 11 and 5 cases respectively (the upper limit of the assay was used in the analysis). 33.4% of patients were starting first line therapy, 25% second line and 16.7% third line. CTC counts (per 7.5cc) ranged from 0 to 1238 (median 2, geometric mean 3.63); none were detected in 29 (30.2%) patients, 1 to 4 in 25 (26%) and 5 or more in 42 (43.8%) patients. CTCs were not associated with age, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, line of treatment, lymph-vascular invasion or tumor grade. Compared to metastatic disease at other sites, CTCs were higher in the presence of bone (p=0.027) and liver metastases (p=0.002) and with progressing bone (p=0.018) and liver (p=0.012) metastases. CTCs were significantly associated with CRP (R =0.25, p=0.014), IL-6 (R=0.31, p=0.002), PAI-1 (R=0.31, p=0.002), Ca15-3 (R=0.44, p=<0.0001) and Ca 125 (R=0.21, p=0.04) but not with VEGF and TNFa (R = 0.11, p= 0.29 and R = 0.16, p=0.11, respectively). Conclusion: CTCs were associated with bone and liver metastases and with higher levels of inflammatory and tumor markers, potentially reflecting tumor burden. Additional inflammatory marker assays are underway. Future studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Citation Format: Lohmann AE, Chang M, Dowling RJO, Ennis M, Amir E, Elser C, Brezden-Masley C, Vandenberg T, Lee E, Fazae K, Stambolic V, Goodwin PJ. Association of inflammatory and tumor markers with circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».