Abstract A029: Cell-based cancer immunotherapy using tumor presenting cells: A phase II trial with local advance prostate cancer patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract We described a non-randomized control phase II trial, using a novel Cell Based Cancer Immunotherapy using Tumor Presenting Cells (TPC). The patient population was selected at HCPA – Porto Alegre Brazil (University Hospital). Patients with clinical localized prostate cancer and scheduled to undergo radical retro pubic prostatectomy (RRP) were identified. High-risk patients (initial PSA levels above 10 ng/ml, Gleason above 8 or upstaged from the clinical staging) were offer to participate on the trial. This group of patients represent a very important clinical population that cloud benefit from an adjuvant therapy. Tumor Presenting Cells are a new strategy for immunotherapy. Solid tumor cells as other non-immunological cells do not present MHC Class II. The MHC class II is a critical molecule responsible for peptide presentation to T helper cells. The presence of a not-self peptide on a MHC II molecule trigger the production of cytokines responsible for different steps on T cell expansion and maturation. Without the appropriate cytokine stimulation, cytotoxic T cells that identified a not-self peptide associate to a MHC class I molecules, may not proliferate or even be induce to anergy. In our model, solid tumor cells (prostate cancer) are induce to express MHCII on their surface. In this novel approach of Cell Based Cancer Immunotherapy (CBCI), patient's tumor cells were expanded in tissue culture and treated causing de novo expression of MHC II and activation of the MHC II peptide presentation pathway. Thus, the modified cancer cells are bifunctional, being capable of activating both helper T cells (MHC II) and cytotoxic T cells (MHCI), leading to cytokine production and a surprisingly robust and cancer-specific immune response. The modified solid tumor cell by itself will now behave as an antigen-presenting cell creating a Tumor Presenting Cell (TPC). Once the tumor cells are modified, they are irradiated and inoculated as intradermal injections (7 doses). Although the individualized preparation of CBCI is labor intensive, we were able to prepare the cell material on almost all collected samples (103/107 - 96%). DTH reactions (≥ 5 mm) were positive in 73% of the patients (16/23). This study corroborates with low toxicity of cell based immunotherapy. We have found mild skin reactions on inoculation sites in all vaccinated patients. More intense reactions (ulceration, low-grade fever, and adenopathy) were found in 13% of patients (3/23). We demonstrated a clinical benefit with the used of the CBCI: 27% (6/22) of the patients submitted to CBCI presented detectable levels of PSA (above 0.004 ng/mL) after 5 years, when compare to 53% (19/36) on the control group (p=0.03). There was also trend on reduction of cancer related mortality, 4% (1/23) on the CBCI group against 10% (4/40) on the control group. Several new therapies were approved in recent years for advanced prostate cancer treatment. The pharmaco-economic cost of these therapies are significant, and most of them shown an improvement survival of less than six months. New therapies such as Cell Base Cancer Immunotherapy with Tumor Presenting Cells could change this scenario, improving quality life, reducing mortality and cost to the health care providers. We are now designing a Phase III trial in North America for local advance prostate cancer. Other indication (triple negative breast cancer, pancreatic or gastric cancer patients) are also under evaluation. Citation Format: Fernando T. Kreutz. Cell-based cancer immunotherapy using tumor presenting cells: A phase II trial with local advance prostate cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR Inaugural International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; September 16-19, 2015; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A029.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».