Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fan Response to Seattle Mariners' 1995 Baseball Season It more than sixty years ago that Mickey Cochrane first called baseball the fan's game. Yet for all of talk of importance of fans, there are very few examples of listening to their voices as they try to articulate what game means to them. Really, a fan's history of baseball in which dominant voice in narrative is voice of those who follow game on a daily basis, is not easily found. What would like to do in this paper is to provide an opportunity to hear voices of baseball fans who followed Seattle Mariners through most exciting period in history of franchise: 1995 My sources come almost exclusively from faxed messages sent to Mariners after their final game of 1995, a Game Six loss to Cleveland in American League Championship Series. What comes through in these faxes is raw sentiment of people whose lives were touched in special ways by Mariners. Written in unguarded moments when relative anonymity of sitting at a computer and composing a fax permits us to speak sincerely without worrying about sounding corny, these letters are heartfelt. Many of faxes remind us of sheer joy that baseball can offer to its fans. As one of faxed messages put it, a world screaming about Bosnian atrocities, scores of people screaming about O.J.'s trial, mothers and fathers screaming about loss of a child by guns, man it great to be screaming about Mariners. Thanks guys. Other faxes go further. In an era in which cynicism and calculated coolness are too often norm, these faxes serve to remind us that adults have their moments of pride, hope, and inspiration, and that baseball can serve as a conduit for these emotions through an intense identification with game and individual players. Perhaps most important, these letters help remind us that baseball has power to bring people together in community. For Seattle Mariners baseball fans, 1995 is simply known as the magical season. As one fan put it as team headed into climactic final week of regular season, There is a magic in air as one Mariner follows another getting hotter than burning phosphorus that falls from Kingdome sky rockets signifying home run after home run and dramatic win after dramatic win. Responses to magic showed up in some unlikely places. I deliver medication to nursing homes and lock-down mental facilities, a fan wrote to Seattle Mariners. I can't thank you enough for joy you guys gave to those people. had never seen them so excited about something before -- They had 'refuse to lose' on their wheel chairs and doors. THE MAGICAL SEASON The season nearly magical enough to stare down death itself. Take, for example, case of ninety-year-old Janet Adams Duke. Her last words to her surgeon, as she left her hospital room on morning of October 7, 1995, before game four of Divisional Series against New York Yankees, were Just get me back here in time for that game. Unfortunately, her family later reported, surgeon was unable to comply, but 'Take Me Out to The Ball game' played at close of her funeral service on October 12. Ms. Duke would have approved of that day for her funeral. It a travel date during League Championship Series. Neither Ms. Duke, undoubtedly cheering from above, nor her family and friends would have to miss a pitch. To understand powerful hold that 1995 had on Ms. Duke and so many other South Puget Sound residents, some background information about awful suffering endured by Mariners fans would be useful. For first seventeen years of team's existence Seattle Mariners were synonymous with mediocrity. The team won nothing; most especially it never came close to winning hearts of its potential fan base in western Washington. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,633 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».