MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2405481661

Safety aspects and patterns of medication use in pregnancy. With special focus on psychotropic medication and mental health

2015· article· en· W2405481661 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Angela Lupattelli

Notice bibliographique

RevueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesHospital for Sick ChildrenNorges ForskningsrådUniversitetet i Oslo
Mots-clésPregnancyFocus (optics)Mental healthPsychotropic medicationPsychiatryMedicinePsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Use of medications, including psychotropics, is common during pregnancy. Indeed, many women might be in need of pharmacotherapy during pregnancy in order to ensure maternalfetal health. However, discordant findings or lack of information about neonatal and maternal safety after use of psychotropics, in particular antidepressants, have so far posed significant challenges on practicing clinicians when assessing the risk of pharmacotherapy versus the risk of not medicated maternal illness. In addition, women's unrealistic risk perception of exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy and individuals' beliefs about prescribed medicines may influence women's adherence to needed medications during pregnancy. \n \nThus, the aims of this doctoral work were: I) to explore from a multinational perspective patterns of and factors associated with use of medications during pregnancy, with particular focus on psychotropics for treatment of depression and/or anxiety; II) to investigate patterns of and associations between use of psychotropics and other relevant medications in the time around pregnancy and eating disorders; III) to explore patterns of and risk factors for low adherence to psychotropics during pregnancy; IV) to determine whether gestational exposure to antidepressants increases the risk of obstetric bleeding complications during pregnancy and postpartum. \n \nIn order to address these research questions, data from two studies were utilized. The Multinational Medication Use in Pregnancy Study, providing information about psychiatric and other disorders during pregnancy, related medications use and adherence during pregnancy as reported by participating women, was used to address aims nos. I and III. The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, comprising information on medication exposures and maternal characteristics during pregnancy, linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway providing information about birth outcomes, were utilized to address aims nos. II and IV. Study I showed that about eight out of ten women used at least one medication during the course of the pregnancy, whereas five out of ten did so during the first trimester. There was a high degree of self-medication with OTC drugs (67%) during pregnancy. About 3% of women reported use of psychotropic medications during pregnancy, mostly SSRIs. Disadvantaged women (e.g. single or divorced, older, with low education, smokers and alcohol consumers during pregnancy) or with an unplanned pregnancy were more likely to use psychotropics during pregnancy. \n \nStudy II showed that use of psychotropics is high among women with eating disorders before, during, and after pregnancy, particularly among women with AN or EDNOS-P. Having BN was found to be significantly directly associated with use (1.8-fold magnitude) and incident use (2.3-fold magnitude) of psychotropics during pregnancy. Having AN or EDNOS-P were found to be significantly directly associated with use of anxiolytics/sedatives postpartum (5.1- and 6.8-fold risk magnitude, respectively). In study III, about 5% of the sample reported having a psychiatric disorder during pregnancy, mainly depression and/or anxiety, and within this group about 50% presented symptoms of depression. Of the women with a psychiatric disorder, 62% were medicated with psychotropics during pregnancy. About one out of two women medicated with psychotropics demonstrated low adherence during pregnancy. Risk factors for low medication adherence were smoking in pregnancy, ongoing symptoms of depression, elevated antidepressant risk perception, and women's individual beliefs about their prescribed psychotropics. \n \nStudy IV showed that exposure to antidepressants during the first or second trimester is not associated with an increased likelihood of vaginal bleeding in early or midpregnancy, respectively. Contrarily, women with depressive symptoms but not exposed to antidepressants during pregnancy had a moderate significant increased likelihood to experience these outcomes. Exposure to SSRIs/SNRIs between gestational week 30 and childbirth did not confer any increased odds for postpartum hemorrhage, compared to non-exposure; however, exposure to TCAs/OADs during this time window conferred a significant 3.8-fold increased odds of postpartum hemorrhage overall, but low statistical power impeded the analysis by mode of delivery. \n \nThe findings of this work highlight the need to increase awareness among healthcare providers that a large proportion of pregnant women will be in need of tailored evidence-based information about the fetal and maternal risks of medication exposures during pregnancy, but also about the risk of untreated psychiatric illness during pregnancy and postpartum.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)Même sujetMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumTravaux en français237 207