Abstract P6-10-17: Rates of prophylactic surgeries among BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers: A single institution experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Women with identified BRCA1/2 mutation have a substantially increased risk of developing several types of cancer, mainly breast and ovarian, during their lifetime. Management options included close surveillance, chemoprevention and prophylactic surgeries. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of prophylactic surgeries among BRCA1/2 carriers counseled and screened at a single institution in the last 2 decades. Methods We retrospectively captured all women with a BRCA1/2 mutation that were identified in our genetic clinic between 2000 and 2015. The incidence of breast and ovarian cancer among all BRCA carriers was reported. The rates of prophylactic surgeries were calculated and analyzed in all identified carriers. Results Six hundred and eighty four women were identified to carry a deleterious BRCA mutation, among them 364 BRCA1 (53%) and 320 BRCA2 (47%). Three hundred and twenty seven (48%) were diagnosed with breast cancer and 80 (12%) had either ovarian or fallopian tumor. Forty percent (N=271) of the women assessed were healthy carriers. Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies (BSO) were performed in 342 women (50%) and prophylactic mastectomies (PM) (bilateral or unilateral) in 190 (28%). Furthermore, 154 women (23%) had both BSO and PM. Of note, 79 women (12%) were less than 35 years old and 122 were less than 40 years old (18%), the majority of those were waiting to have BSO later on. If we remove the young women from the analysis, 57 and 61% of the women would have had BSO (less than 35 and 40 years excluded respectively). If we only analyze the women who had a recent follow up in our clinic (2014-2015), 422 women would be eligible. Among those, 58 and 84 were less than 35 and 40 years old (y) respectively. For this cohort, the rates of BSO would be 61% (257/422)(whole cohort), 71% (excluding women less than 35y) and 76% (excluding women less than 40y). Conclusion A promising rate of BSO was reported in our cohort of BRCA carriers as compared to the literature. This rate was even higher (from 50 to over 70%) when we only analyzed patients with recent follow up in clinic and when we excluded young women waiting to have BSO. More efforts are needed to determine why the rates of PM are lower, for example limited breast reconstruction resources, in order to reduce the incidence of subsequent invasive breast cancer in this high-risk population. Citation Format: Raphael J, Hewitt P, Graham T, Ott K, Mancuso T, Lorentz J, Emmerson M, Eisen A. Rates of prophylactic surgeries among BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers: A single institution experience. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-17.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».