MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2410150888

Lifeworks: Empirical evidence

2002· article· en· W2410150888 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Vivian Tors

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePhotography and Visual Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStudioVisual artsPhotographyReputationArtMeaning (existential)Art historyAestheticsSociologyPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For the past thirty years, artist Lynne Cohen has presented a unique and consistent vision of the world through her photographs. Based in Ottawa since 1973, the American-born Cohen has established an international reputation for her large-format photographs of public and institutional interiors: halls, offices, classrooms, laboratories, meeting rooms, spas, military installations — utilitarian spaces we occupy in daily life without a second thought. Cohen directs her clear-eyed gaze on these banal environments and exposes them as being loaded with unexpected meaning. Organized by the National Gallery of Canada in collaboration with the Musee de L'Elysee in Lausanne, Switzerland, No Man's Land: The Photography of Lynne Cohen has been thoughtfully mounted by curator Ann Thomas with much input from the artist. The meticulous attention to the arrangement of the sixty-nine photographs on display evokes the care with which they have been executed. The result is an impressive show with a great deal of integrity. The entire NGC Prints, Drawings and Photography gallery is devoted to this comprehensive retrospective of Cohen's work until May 12, 2002. Cohen's art, like that of her predecessor, Marcel Duchamp (1887–1968) originates in a fascination with ready-made art in everyday environments. Initially working as a sculptor, Cohen first attempted to reproduce samples of found art in the studio. However, she felt this practice resulted in too much artistic imposition on the work. Experimenting with an 8 х 10 view camera, which has the capacity to capture texture and volume in extraordinary detail, she discovered she could communicate her observations about the spaces we inhabit with the necessary degree of precision. Photography's authority as a medium of documentation has allowed Cohen to present her view of the world as empirical evidence. Yet Cohen's photographs are not documentary records; they are not about the specific details of an identifiable place, even though they are presented as such. The impact of Cohen's work derives from her ability to persuade us, her audience, to accept her images as truthful documents while convincing us that what we are looking at cannot possibly be so. Model Living Room (1976), an early piece, already exhibits the characteristic elements of Cohen's work. The scene appears to be a photographic record of some sort of showroom advertisement, or of a sculpture installation, maybe even one created by the artist herself. But nothing is what it appears to be: a man and woman sitting across from each other, reading in the living room, are merely silhouettes cut from Plexiglass, supported not by upholstered chairs, but by chains anchored to the ceiling. On the wall behind them is a framed collection of claw-like branches, which variously could be a window, a mirror or a piece of art. Its purpose is unclear. The ambiguous mirror/window motif is repeated in a reflection on the male figure's “newspaper.” Adding to the confusion, instead of a coffee table, a massive, dark potted fern is incongruously placed between the couple in the centre of the image, conjuring up notions of an alien invader, maybe one that feeds on plastic coffee tables — such is the power of suggestion in a Lynne Cohen photograph. Even while we question its authenticity and wonder about the fate of the couple's “model-living-room” furniture we accept this simulated domestic scene because of Cohen's skill at persuasion. Through the continual use of both contextual and visual self-contradictions, Cohen conjures up, seemingly without effort, a sense of disequilibrium in the viewer. In more recent images such as Spa (1994) and Laboratory (1999), she also reduces her content to a minimum, thereby heightening the sense of mystery and dislocation characteristic of her work. This approach serves to further the impression that we are all collectively hovering increasingly closer to some irrational central core of being. In the end, Cohen, like a magician, asks us to suspend our disbelief as we view her photographs. That we willingly accept this proposition, even though we are unsettled by it, is a testament to her mastery of sleight of hand and, by extension, to our own vulnerability to the power of suggestion. It is at this point that No Man's Land becomes a cautionary tale about unquestioningly accepting the concept of neutral territory. After all, the wrong turn into no man's land will lead you to a mine. A truncated, hand-lettered sign in War Game (1987) hung behind a simultaneously nondescript and ominous pile of sandbags warns both player and viewer to “Play at your own — ”. The last word is obscured. Lynne Cohen challenges us to fill in that blank space, jolting us into that moment of awareness in which we realize there may be more than one way to complete that unfinished phrase. Vivian Tors Ottawa, Ont.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,082
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,112
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,373

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,082
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0070,013
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0070,009
Science ouverte0,0050,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1120,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,090
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association JournalMême sujetPhotography and Visual CultureTravaux en français237 207