MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2410184314 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02994.x

Letter to the Editors

2007· letter· en· W2410184314 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fokaline Vroom, Paul B. van den Berg, Lolkje T.W. de Jong‐van den Berg

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2007
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePregnancy and Medication Impact
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePregnancyMedical prescriptionGestationPopulationEpidemiologyPediatricsGestational ageObstetricsPharmacyDatabaseFamily medicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 2005, a warning based on epidemiological studies describing associations between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use in early pregnancy and risks of miscarriages, cardiac malformations and gastroschisis [1], was given by European registration authorities (e.g. the Dutch). NSAIDs and ASA should not be used during the first trimesters of pregnancy except when this is strictly indicated. We describe to what extent NSAIDs and ASA were prescribed during pregnancy in the Netherlands before this warning. We performed our study by using pharmacy dispensing data from IADB.nl (population-based database) in Northern and Eastern Netherlands. This database comprises all prescription drugs, excluding drugs dispensed during hospitalizations and over the counter (OTC)-drugs. Date of birth and gender of each patient are available and all patients have an unique anonymous identifier. The pregnancy-IADB.nl (1995–2004) was extracted from the main IADB.nl-database. Children were selected by date of birth and by using an address code the mother of this child was identified. With this method, which is described in detail by Schirm et al.[2], approximately 65% of the children could be linked to their mother and validation showed 99% correctness. Only live-born children are registered in this database. Gestational age is calculated for every mother by subtracting 273 days (three trimesters of 91 days, approximately 9 months) from day of birth of the child. This period will be considered as gestation and is per definition 273 days. Prevalence, calculated before, during and after pregnancy, is based on exposure rate. Exposure rate is defined as the number of pregnancies in which, in theory, a women has availability to a drug or class of drugs, i.e. those who received a prescription in one trimester which was extended into the next, are counted for both trimesters in which they had access to the drug. We identified 14 666 pregnancies from which we had information of a defined time window of 3 months before gestation till 3 months after delivery. NSAIDs (ATC-code: M01A) and/or ASA (ATC-code: N02BA) were prescribed during this defined time window to 2020 women (13.8%). In 7.6% (1113/14 666) of the pregnancies these drugs were prescribed before conception, in 3.8% (557/14 666) during gestation and in 5.3% (781/14 666) after pregnancy (Figure 1). Ninety-six % of the women received NSAIDs (mainly diclofenac, ibuprofen and naproxen), less than 5.5% received ASA and approximately 1.5% received both drugs. Average age at time of delivery of women receiving NSAIDs and/or ASA (29.74 years, range 16–49) did not differ from those not receiving these drugs (29.91 years, P = 0.077 (Student's t-test). Number of pregnancies in which a NSAID and/or ASA was prescribed before, during and after pregnancy In the majority of the pregnancies (75.6%, 421/557) NSAIDs and/or ASA were prescribed during the first trimester, resulting in an overall first trimester exposure of 2.9%. International studies from Canada [3], Denmark [4] and Sweden [5], reporting on first trimester NSAID use/prescribing showed comparable results: 2.9%, 3% and 3.4%, respectively. Third trimester prescribing of NSAIDs and/or ASA was low (0.6%, n = 94) which was to be expected due to guidelines stating not to prescribe these drugs during the third trimester. Part of the first trimester exposure will be due to unawareness of pregnancy by the women. By using a standardized gestational age to determine drug prescribing, misclassification especially in the first trimester of pregnancy will be introduced, leading to overestimation of actual use. On the other hand, our data lack information about OTC-use which will lead to underestimate of actual use. Unpublished data of EUROCAT-registration Northern-Netherlands showed that NSAID exposure in pregnancy was due to 60% on prescription and 35% OTC. We do realize these data represent prescribing of NSAIDs and/or ASA before the warning from European authorities. However, we strongly recommend that prescribing physicians need to be careful in prescribingthese drugs to women of fertile age, especially when use of these drugs during pregnancy increases risks of miscarriages and birth defects. Whether this warning will result in less prescribing of NSAIDs and/or ASA, especially during the first trimester, has to be examined in future research, national as well as international. We would like to thank EUROCAT-registration Northern-Netherlands for their data.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,084
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,281

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,031
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0840,065

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,460
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of Clinical PharmacologyMême sujetPregnancy and Medication ImpactTravaux en français237 207