Influence of claw disorders on production and reproduction performance in observed herds of dairy cows
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Received: 2016-02-01  |  Accepted: 2016-03-29  |  Available online: 2016-05-31 dx.doi.org/10.15414/afz.2016.19.02.35-40 The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of claw disorders on claw formation,  production and reproduction performance of Holstein and Slovak Simmental dairy cows. Claw formation after functional trimming was evaluated by measurement of claw angle, claw length, heel index, claw height, diagonal and claw width. Incidence of interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion, digital dermatitis were observed. Separately was observed the incidence of sole ulcers with the progress of diseases. Measurements were carried out in spring and in autumn. Holstein dairy cows (n=101) with production 11874.77 kg of milk, 3.94 % of fat and 3.34 % of protein and Slovak Simmental cows (n=101) with production 5834.25 kg of milk, 4.44 % of fat and 3.59 % of protein were included into study. Holstein and Slovak Simmental dairy cows affected with claw diseases produced on first lactations 553.67 resp. 838.71 kg of milk more than average production of observed groups. On the second and higher lactations dairy cows of Holstein and Slovak Simmental breed affected with claw diseases produced 734.3 resp. 1118.3 kg of milk less than healthy dairy cows. Statistically significant differences in claws formation were observed in both breeds according to the claw trimming season. Keywords: Holstein breed, Slovak Spotted breed, claws, interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion References BICALHO, R.C., MACHADO. V.S. and CAIXETA. L.S.(2009) Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cattle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, pp. 3175-3184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1827 BORSBERRY, S. and DOBSON, H. (1989) Periparturient diseases and their effect on reproductive-performance in 5 dairy herds. Veterinary Record, v ol. 124, pp. 217-219. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.124.9.217 COLLICK, D., WARD, W. and DOBSON, H. (1989) Associations between types of lameness and fertility. Veterinary Record. vol. 125, pp. 103-106. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.125.5.103 DIPPEL, S. et al. (2009) Risk factors for lameness in cubicle housed Austrian Simmental dairy cows.  Preventive Veterinary Medicine. vol. 90, pp. 102-112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014 DÃPFER, D. 1994. Epidemiological investigations about digital dermatitis on two dairy farms . Ph.D Thesis, Hanover: Tierartzliche Hochschule. JANSSEN, S. et al. (2015) Feeding behaviour, activity and energy metabolism in dairy cows with acute and mild claw lameness. In Proceedings of Third DairyCare Conference , Zadar, Croatia. JURKOVICH, V. et al. (2015) Claw health assessment in dairy cattle herds. In Proceedings of Third Dairy Care Conference , Zadar, Croatia. KASARDA, R. et al. (2015) Detailed view to claw formation. Miniinfo aprÃl 2015 . SHA: Ivanka pri Dunaji, pp. 16-19 (in Slovak) KREMER, P.V. et al. (2007) Comparison of claw health and milk yield in dairy cows on elastic or concrete flooring. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, pp. 4603-4611. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-549 KRUPOVÃ, Z. et al. (2016) Economic values for health and feed efficiency traits of dual-purpose cattle in marginal areas. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 99, pp. 644-656. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9951 LEACH, K.A. et al. (2012) The effects of early treatment for hindlimb lameness in dairy cows on four commercial UK farms. The Veterinary Journal, vol. 193, pp. 626-632. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.043 MICHIE, C. and ANDONOVIC, I. (2015) Silent Herdsman Platform; Impact of Detecting Eating Patterns. In Proceedings of Third DairyCare Conference , Zadar, Croatia. NORRING, M. et al. (2014) Empathic veterinarians score cattle pain higher. The Veterinary Journal, vol. 200, pp. 186-190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.02.005 OIKONOMOU, G., COOK, N.B. and BICALHO, R.C. (2013) Sire predicted transmitting ability for conformation and yield traits and previous lactation incidence of foot lesions as risk factors for incidence of foot lesions in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, pp. 3713-3722. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6308 PETERSSON, K.J. et al. (2006) Environmental effects on progesterone profile measures of dairy cow fertility. In Animal Reproduction Scienc,. vol. 91, pp. 201-214. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.04.010 RANDALL. L.V. et al. (2015) Low body condition predisposes cattle to lameness: An 8-year study of one dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 98. pp. 3766-3777. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8863 ROUHA-MÃLLEDER, C. et al. (2009) Relative importance of factors influencing the prevalence of lameness in Austrian cubicle loose-housed dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 92, pp. 123-133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.07.008 SCHRICK, F.N. et al. (2001) Influence of subclinical mastitis during early lactation on reproductive parameters. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 84, pp. 1407-1412. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)70172-5 SCOTT, P.R., PENNY, C.D. and MACRAE, A.I. (2011) Cattle medicine . London: Manson Publishing, 288 p. SHEARER, J., VAN AMSTEL, S. and GONZALEZ, A. (2005) Manual of foot care in cattle . Fort Atkinson: Hoard´s Dairyman Books. SMITH. R. (2015) Interaction between lameness. reproduction and the HPA axis. In Proceedings of Third DairyCare Conference , Zadar, Croatia. SOGSTAD, A.M., OSTERAS, O. and FJELDAAS, T.(2006) Bovine claw and limb disorders related to reproductive performance and production diseases. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 89, pp. 2519-2528. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72327-x SOLANO, L. et al. (2015) Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Fresian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science , vol. 98, pp. 6978-6991. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9652 SOMERS, J.G.C.J. et al. (2005) Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cows kept on different floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, pp. 110-120. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72668-0 Å ÃROVÃ, R. et al. (2011) Farm managers underestimate lameness prevalence in Czech dairy herds. Animal Welfare, vol. 20, pp. 201-204. ŠŤASTNÃ, P., PODMANICKÃ, D. and ŠŤASTNÃ, D. (2008) Papillomatous digital dermatitis of cows. Slovenský chov, vol. 13, pp. 35-37 (in Slovak) THE BREEDING SERVICES OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. S. E. (2015) Results of dairy herd milk recording in Slovak Republic in control year 2013-2014. [Online]. Retrieved January 11, 2016 from http://pssr.sk/org/publ/2014/hd/rocenka/ml_13_14/rocenka/Mliekova_rocenka_2014.pdf THORUP, V.M. et al. (2015) Lameness in cows affects daily feeding time but not rumination time as characterized from sensors. In Proceedings of Third DairyCare Conference , Zadar, Croatia. VERMUNT, J. J. and GREENOUGH, P. R. (1995) Structural characteristics of the bovine claw: Horn growth and wear. horn hardness and claw conformation.  Brtitish veterinary journal , vol. 151,  pp. 157-180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1935(95)80007-7 VON KEYSERLINGK, M.A.G. et al. (2012) Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: Lameness. leg injuries. lying time. facility design. and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 95, pp. 7399-7408. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5807 WALKER, S.L. et al. (2008) Chronic stress. hormone profiles and estrus intensity in dairy cattle. Hormones and Behavior,  vol. 53, pp. 493-501. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.12.003 WEAVER, A.D. (2000) Lamenes. In: ANDREWS. A.H. The Health of Dairy Cattle. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 359.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».