MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2410417659 · doi:10.1097/01.jaa.0000443809.04789.f5

The global PA movement

2014· editorial· en· W2410417659 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Kuhns

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAPA · 2014
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueNursing Roles and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careGlobal healthPolitical scienceFace (sociological concept)Quarter (Canadian coin)Economic shortagePublic relationsCertificationMedicineSociologyHistoryLawSocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In an article for JAAPA's October 1992 Silver Anniversary Edition, former AAPA President William Marquardt reflected on the first quarter-century of our profession and shared a vision for our future. “Physician assistants will be worldwide leaders,” he wrote, “vital to providing care and improving medical care to all people.” In the same issue, Jack Liskin, former PA program director at the University of Southern California, also offered predictions: “The world has become a global village in which we know almost instantly what everyone else is doing and realize that events in one place will have an effect everywhere else.” Liskin hoped that our burgeoning profession would take time to reflect on its past and critically examine our future. As we move closer to the profession's 50th anniversary we are struck by these authors' observations, especially when considering how our profession has evolved domestically and worldwide. The American PA movement continues to gain momentum. There are nearly 100,000 certified physician assistants, PA programs across the country are expanding, and new programs are being started. Our movement also appears to be a catalyst for a global PA movement. Countries worldwide clearly face many of the same problems and challenges in supporting health and caring for the sick. In Liskin's global village, the PA model is being embraced and cultivated to increase access to care, grow safety nets, lower costs, and address medical provider shortages. Beginning this month, JAAPA will investigate the global PA phenomenon and offer commentary and brief reports from clinical and academic leaders who will describe current challenges and opportunities, share a vision for the future, and discuss practice innovations unique to their countries. In this issue of JAAPA, Ian Jones writes about the evolution of the PA movement in Canada. Closely tied to the military at its beginnings in 1999, the PA model in Canada continues to move steadily into the civilian sector to address unmet medical needs and access to care barriers created, in part, by Canada's vast rural areas and maldistribution of healthcare resources. In the months ahead, we will hear from leaders elsewhere, including India, Australia, South Africa, and the Netherlands. Demand has driven growth of the PA movement in the Netherlands, which has passed its first decade, with the Dutch government urging the development of the PA model and integration of training programs into its country's universities. The government support has paved the way for greater autonomy among Dutch PAs, who facilitate task realignment from an overly burdened physician workforce. Parallels between the PA movements in these countries and the United States are clear, such as the military roots of the profession. The United States is supporting this global PA movement through the success of our PA model as well as with consultative, diplomatic efforts by numerous American PA leaders working beyond our borders. Perhaps the vision described by Marquardt in 1992 opened doors for this global movement and is now actively being realized. Echoing some of the sentiments shared by Liskin, we offer a few key questions. Which trends and innovations in the PA profession outside the United States are distinct and may inspire advancements in the PA profession in America? Which strategies are countries outside the United States using to optimize the PA profession in ways that are bringing about measurable improvements in healthcare access, quality, and cost? How can PAs in America support and contribute to the continued growth of the PA profession around the world? How can active involvement and increased awareness in this global movement make us better clinicians, advocates, and leaders? Liskin also wrote, “For tomorrow's PAs, such awareness will mean fully awakening to the world outside our practices.” He worried that our increased success and autonomy, and probably our increased diversity across practice settings and specialties, had the potential to make us less sympathetic to the needs of others. We propose that as our profession nears its 50th anniversary, there is no better way to reconnect with our roots or consider our future than to raise our awareness of the global PA movement. Understanding the distinctive trends and innovations occurring beyond our borders might just offer us fertile ground for envisioning the next 50 years of the PA profession at home.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,087
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,445
Écart entre enseignants0,423 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAPAMême sujetNursing Roles and PracticesTravaux en français237 207