MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2410878004

Exploring long-stay seniors’ transitions from home care services to self-management

2014· dissertation· en· W2410878004 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Awais Malik

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2014
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSelf-managementSelf careGerontologyPsychologyMedicineNursingComputer scienceHealth careEconomic growthEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As a result of longer life expectancies and below-replacement fertility rates, the Canadian population is aging. Approximately 14.8% of the Canadian population was aged 65 years or older in 2011. The senior population is faced with co-morbidities and polypharmacy. The result is a significantly higher usage of healthcare resources by seniors. Homecare services allow seniors to stay at home and manage their complexity by providing home support services and care coordination. However, limited resources for homecare have led to long waitlists and prioritization of short-stay, acute clients at the expense of long-stay seniors. As a result, long-stay seniors are often discharged faster, leading to transitions. Appropriate transitional care ensures the coordination and continuity of care and may help seniors avoid poor health outcomes. \nThis study used a qualitative approach, more specifically Grounded theory, to explore the transition from homecare to self-management and had 3 objectives: 1) describe the preparation of long-stay seniors for self-management at discharge from home support services in the Waterloo-Wellington CCAC, through the perspectives of seniors and/or their caregivers, as well as care coordinators; 2) assess the quality of transition from the perspectives of long-stay seniors and their caregivers, including successful actions and challenges, from homecare services to self-management; and 3) examine the senior’s and caregiver’s experience of the transition and subsequent unmet needs for homecare services. \nThree seniors, two dyads of seniors and caregivers, and one caregiver were interviewed, as well as six care coordinators from the Waterloo-Wellington Community Care Access Center (WW-CCAC) using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews with Seniors and/or their caregivers were used to address all three objectives, while interviews with care coordinators helped address the first objective.. \nResults showed that the preparation for discharge lacked a discussion between care coordinators and seniors/caregivers on medication management, limited knowledge of health conditions and limited information of health service providers of seniors and caregivers. However, seniors and caregivers were aware of available community supports. Subsequently, the transitional care after discharge form homecare services lacked a mechanism to ensure follow-up with primary healthcare professionals as well as a formal process for medication though a large support network was available to the seniors. The seniors and caregivers reported a positive experience with managing their own care after discharge with limited perceived need of homecare or formal help and capability to manage and cope without homecare services. Overall, there was a poorly informed discharge and limited transitional care but a positive subjective experience and avoidance of adverse health issues. A theoretical framework for the perceived transition from homecare services to self-management after discharge from WW-CCAC was generated from the findings. The framework presents a disconnect between actual needs and perceived needs for transitional care. Seniors are hesitant in seeking out care or information while care coordinators expect seniors to take initiative if any issues or concerns need to be addressed. These findings suggest room for improvement when preparing seniors for discharge from homecare services to avoid poor health outcomes that may result. There seems to be an absence of many important elements of successful transitional care in this specific transition. Seniors’ and/or their caregivers’ lack of proactively seeking information and resources may contribute to the lack of preparation by care coordinators. \nThis study provides an important first step in understanding the transition from homecare service to self-management after discharge. Further research should further test the results of this study by implementing an intervention based on the theoretical framework presented in this study. The result also have the potential to contribute to discharge planning at WW-CCAC to improve the transition.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,925
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,148

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,004
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentTravaux en français237 207