Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This year's Annual Dialysis Conference was held in the Georgia World Conference Center in Atlanta from February 8th to the 11th and was the 34th such international conference sponsored by the University of Missouri. What started all those years ago as a conference devoted to peritoneal dialysis gradually evolved over the years to include hemodialysis, pediatric dialysis and home hemodialysis. The audience today includes not only physicians and nurses but social workers, dieticians, technicians, administrators, representatives of all aspects of the dialysis industry, government, and other interested parties including, of course, patients. The program includes presentations and discussions on all aspects of dialysis together with educational sessions, presentation of selected abstracts, poster sessions and a comprehensive exhibition. In addition, on the day before the meeting there are specific programs including one day comprehensive courses on hemodialysis, the fundamentals of home hemodialysis, the fundamentals of dialysis in children, a program specifically designed for dialysis technicians and a program on the challenges and opportunities for daily dialysis in North America. Each year the conference hosts between 2,000 and 3,000 attendees. As noted previously, this year is the 50th anniversary of the beginning use of home hemodialysis and I am happy to say that the program included more items related to this treatment than in any previous year. This is encouraging as home hemodialysis in the U.S. is gradually increasing but has not yet reached 2% of prevalent dialysis patients. Nine other countries have a higher percentage of such patients, led by New Zealand (16%) and Australia (8.5%). The others are Denmark, Finland, Canada, Sweden, the UK , the Netherlands and Hong Kong. It would be interesting to speculate how these differences came about. About 6 months ago Stanley Shaldon died. He was one of the pioneers of hemodialysis and 50 years ago was the first to treat a patient by overnight home hemodialysis. This issue of Hemodialysis International includes an obituary of Stanley by Angus Rae, one of his early collaborators. About the time this issue of Hemodialysis International reaches you the International Society for Hemodialysis will be holding their 7th International Congress in Okinawa and in September this year the 8th Congress will be held in Shanghai, China—see the notice in this issue. The 9th Congress will be held next year in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In addition, the Hemodialysis University will have held its second oversea meeting in Hyderabad, India at the beginning of March this year. Note that the edited recordings of the Universities are available on the ISHD website, http://www.ishd.net/, as are links to people and events related to the early history of dialysis. The website also provides information for physicians, nurses, students and others on how to become members of the ISHD and so receive Hemodialysis International and access to back files. Why not join the ISHD?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,524 | 0,367 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».