Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: To compare the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and dynamic bulk modulus of five resins and an experimental unfilled resin polymerized with a stepped power light and with a conventional one step curing light. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parallel sided glass rings 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm high were etched for 5 min with hydrofluoric acid and silanated. The density and volume of the rings were calculated before they were filled with either SureFil, AEliteflo, Pertac II, Z100, or an experimental unfilled resin. When cured, the resin was bonded to the glass ring which produced a mold with a configuration C-factor of approximately 0.8. The resin was cured for 40 s on each side using either a one step curing light or a stepped power curing light. After curing, the specimens were weighed in air and in water to calculate their final density and volumetric shrinkage. Ten samples were made using each light system and for each resin (total of 100 samples). The bulk modulus was determined for each resin using an ultrasonic method, and the percentage filler contents were determined by thermogravimetric analysis. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD volumetric polymerization shrinkage values ranged from 3.10 +/- 1.19% for SureFil using the one step light to 12.35 +/- 1.38% for the unfilled resin using the stepped power curing light. Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test separated the 10 different materials into three significant groups at P= 0.05. The unfilled resin exhibited the highest volumetric shrinkage followed by the flowable composite (AEliteflo). For all materials tested, there was no significant difference in the volumetric shrinkage values when the resin was cured with the one step or the stepped power curing light. There was no significant difference in the volumetric shrinkage values for the hybrid composites (Pertac II, Z100, and SureFil). The volumetric shrinkage values were highly sensitive to filler weight (P < 0.001). Except for Z100, there was no difference in the specific gravity values and velocities of the longitudinal and shear waves and bulk modulus when the one step and stepped power curing lights were used. The bulk modulus values ranged from 6.30 +/- 0.19 GPa for unfilled resin, to 17.10 +/- 1.09 GPa for Z100. Curing with the one step or the stepped curing light had no significant effect on the modulus values for any resin with the exception of Z100, P = 0.05. The bulk modulus values were highly sensitive to filler weight, and higher modulus values were associated with increased filler weight (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the bulk modulus of Pertac II and SureFil (P = 0.05).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».