Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Michael de Swiet, editor Malden (MA): Blackwell Science; 2002. 616 pp; US$146.95 (cloth) ISBN 0-632-05395-X Rating: *** Audience: Residents in obstetrics, generalists Content: For obstetrics residents and for generalists due for a review, this book is engaging and fluent enough to be read at the lake, yet meaty enough to provide a sense of familiarity and confidence for readers faced with medical problems in pregnant patients. For the internist newly or infrequently consulting in obstetrics, it provides enough information to assuage that all-too-common sense of discomfort when dealing with 2 patients, one within the other. However this is not a sufficiently exhaustive reference for perinatologists or subspecialists in obstetric medicine. This book is a refreshingly readable and concise overview of medical problems likely to be encountered in obstetric practice, ranging from diseases of the major organ systems through infection to substance abuse and psychiatric illness. It provides an elegant review of basic physiology and pathophysiology, discusses the impact of disease on pregnancy and pregnancy on disease, and gives useful recommendations for clinical care. Strengths: De Swiet and most of his co-authors write beautifully, and their clinical acumen is evident. Tables and figures are few but appropriate: for example, the list of occult causes of collapse in pregnancy is brilliant. Drug doses, routes and half-lives are consistently provided; this is particularly useful in the delivery room at 3:30 am. I used the helpful index to look up a dozen questions I have recently faced. Those relating to common problems were well addressed on the basis of evidence and the authors' experience. This book feels ‘just right’ as a concise but useful synopsis. Limitations: There are significant errors and omissions. For instance, carbamazepine is missing from the list of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs affecting fetal coagulation; cesarean section is suggested based on herpes culture results at term; bromocriptine is suggested for lactation suppression; current information about teratogenic risks of trimethoprim is missing; and a urine pregnancy test is claimed to be unreliable on the basis of a reference dating back to 1967. I found no reference to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, a not-infrequent issue in pregnancy. The chapters on gastrointestinal and liver disease suffer from poor English, an inability to distill from the literature coherently, poorly founded recommendations, and obsolete references (e.g., in the hyperemesis section). Some minor annoyances include mislabeled references and typos. Erica Eason Associate Professor Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ont. This book is available through your local book retailer, or through the publisher at www.blackwellpublishing.com/book_default.asp
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,107 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».