MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2412384246

Ain't There No More: The Times- Picayune Downsizes

2016· article· en· W2412384246 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff W. Totten, Craig R. Davis, Hans K. Meyer

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of case studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCarrJournalismMedia studiesManagementSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Announcement Ricky Mathews, incoming president of NOLA Media Group, a subsidiary of Advance Publications Inc., announced on May 24, 2012, that 175-year-old Orleans Times-Picayune [T-P] no longer publish a printed paper each day, beginning sometime in fall. The focus shift to online news gathering 24/7 instead (McGill, 2012; New digitally focused company, 2012). Did Ricky Mathews fully understand marketing implications of this decision? In other words, did he know how this change resonate with readers, considered highly brand loyal to T-P? The changes coming in fall were necessitated by revolutionary upheaval in industry, Matthews said. These changes made it essential for news-gathering operation to evolve and become digitally focused, (New digitally focused company, 2012). Mathews also noted that the transition be difficult and that move will result in a reduction in size of workforce (New digitally focused company, 2012). The be delivered to homes and sold in stores on Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays only (New digitally focused company, 2012). An alternative weekly in city, Gambit, reported that paper's employees were in shock (Mirkinson, 2012). News of impending changes appeared in The York Times day before (Carr, 2012) and was explosive for employees and anyone who loved Orleans, its celebrated newspaper, or who followed long-struggling (Theim, 2013, p. 92). T-P Editor Jim Amoss stated, We continue our 175-year commitment to covering communities we serve (New digitally focused company, 2012). The Poynter Institute, a noted journalism policy organization, said move would make Orleans largest city in country without a daily printed newspaper (Descant, 2012). Edward Atorino, a media industry analyst, said other major metro papers are watching T-P's experiment very closely (McGill, 2012). Atorino expected to see more movement away from traditional seven-day paper as print advertising dollars continued to decline, from approximately $23 billion in 2008 to $19 billion in 2011 (McGill, 2012). The decline continued in 2012 to $18.9 billion (Pew Research Center, 201). Market penetration for T-P (print only) had fallen from 68% in 2010 to 64% in 2012 (Pew Research Center, 2014). [For more information about industry, see Appendix A.] History Established as The Picayune in [January] 1837, paper's initial price was one picayune, a Spanish coin equivalent to about 6 cents (Readex, 2013). It covered many historical events including Mexican War, catastrophic floods, Civil War, Reconstruction and city's growth (Readex, 2013). Journalistic innovations, under first female publisher of a major paper, Eliza Jane Poitevent, included society pages and specific pages for children (Readex, 2013). It merged with its competitor, The Times-Democrat, on April 5, 1914 to become The Times-Picayune (Readex, 2013; Karst, 2014). Thorough coverage of major events continued in 20th century, including both World Wars, terrible hurricanes, Governor Huey Long's career, levee construction and election of city's first African-American mayor in 1978 (Readex, 2013). Samuel Newhouse, Sr., owner of Advance Publications, purchased The Times-Picayune and afternoon paper in Orleans, The States-Item, in 1962. The papers were merged in 1980 and were published as The Times-Picayune/The States-Item. The name was shortened to The Times-Picayune in 1986 (Wikipedia, 2013). The gained national attention and was later awarded a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2006 for reporting on Hurricane Katrina (August 29, 2005 and months afterwards). Staffers camped out in middle of building and kept posting updates on paper's website, NOLA. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,264
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,311

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of case studiesMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207