MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2412615650 · doi:10.1093/pch/5.4.201

CHRIMCY: A major step in the right direction

2000· article· en· W2412615650 sur OpenAlexaff
Upton Allen

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The formation of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the provision of millions of dollars in additional funding to promote research and innovation are extremely important developments in Canadian health-related research. Following the announcement of the decision to create the CIHR in the federal budget of February 1999, an Interim Governing Council (IGC) was established to develop CIHR into a functional structure that would build on a tradition of research excellence (1). One of the activities of the IGC was a public consultation process to solicit input into recommendations for the creation of CIHR institutes once the new umbrella organization was established. One year after the CIHR Act was tabled in the House of Commons, the IGC is at an advanced stage of focusing on future CIHR institutes to ensure that all areas of research are captured in a manner that is consistent with modern strategic directions. While the formation of CIHR is a major milestone in Canadian health-related research, several challenges lie ahead. The success of this initiative depends, in part, on the efficiency with which the structure functions in relation to its various components. In this regard, the nature of the future CIHR institutes is of critical importance. The Canadian Health Research Institute for Mother, Child, and Youth (CHRIMCY) is one of the proposed institutes. This proposed institute would ensure that research into maternal, child and youth issues is adequately represented throughout the CIHR structure. Such representation is in keeping with the fact that women of child-bearing age, children and youth accounted for 45% of the Canadian population in 1998. The primary goals proposed by the Coordinating Committee for CHRIMCY are to initiate, support and disseminate excellence in peer-reviewed research that encompasses the critical stages of life throughout childhood and adolescence, including preconception, pregnancy, and fetal and newborn development (2). These are achievable goals that would be facilitated by the establishment of appropriate partnerships and collaborative infrastructures. The Coordinating Committee for CHRIMCY should be congratulated for its efforts to ensure that potential partners in the field of maternal, child and youth health are identified. A visit to the CHRIMCY website reveals a directory survey that was developed to register active researchers from across Canada, whose activities fall within the mandate of CHRIMCY. CHRIMCY is starting off on the right footing by ensuring that input is obtained from a wide cross-section of researchers, particularly regarding the type of support that they require to maximize their research potential. CHRIMCY would harness the efforts of hundreds of researchers who collectively pursue research themes in the areas of mother, child and youth. The proposed institute would undoubtedly benefit from the existing infrastructures of some of its key partners and potential partners, more than 20 of which have been identified. It is reasonable to state that if CHRIMCY is established, it will play a major role in the future of health research into issues relating to mothers, children and youth. For CHRIMCY to be successful, the focus should always be on issues that are of primary importance to the health and well-being of Canadian mothers, children and youth. These concerns can easily be neglected due to competing demands for limited resources in settings where different priorities may be placed on issues involving mothers, children and youth compared with other population groups. Thus, it is very important that if CHRIMCY is established as one of the CIHR institutes, it does not become diluted by the inclusion of population groups that are diverse, with distinct and separate health issues from mothers, children and youth. It is acknowledged that some diseases may affect different age groups and sexes. However, in situations where common diseases exist among mothers, children and youth, as well as other populations, the origins, manifestations or consequences of the diseases may be very different. This has often resulted in different priorities being placed on competing health strategies. Every effort should be made to place maternal, child and youth issues at the forefront of health research in Canada. Collaborative research into these areas would be facilitated by CHRIMCY. Such collaboration is important to optimize the efficiency and success of CHRIMCY, thereby ultimately benefiting the health of mothers, children and youth. The strength and success of such collaborative efforts are directly related to whether researchers have enough in common to make collaboration meaningful. The federal government has expressed a commitment to address the health of children and youth. CHRIMCY would play a major partnership role in this regard. Once again, let us congratulate the Coordinating Committee of CHRIMCY for its vision, and for moving this initiative forward. The formation of this institute would undoubtedly be one of the major developments in Canadian medical history relating to mothers, children and youth.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,023
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,062
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,208

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0230,035
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,018
Communication savante0,0140,016
Science ouverte0,0040,020
Intégrité de la recherche0,0270,049
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0620,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesTravaux en français237 207