Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canadians will be heading to the polls in a federal election widely expected to occur October 19, 2015. Although the pundits would argue that political parties have been campaigning for months already, most election-related activities, such as public debates and door-to-door campaigning by candidates, will begin to ramp up in late summer and fall. As the 2015 federal election campaign moves into high gear, the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA) has identified key recommendations and messages for federal political candidates on 3 key national issues of importance to the profession. These 3 issues include the following: Pan-Canadian Pharmacare Program: CPhA is seeking commitment from all federal political parties to work with the provinces/territories, health care professionals and other stakeholders towards the development of a pan-Canadian pharmacare program. Such a program must address coverage gaps between public and private systems, protect Canadians from undue financial hardship and guarantee access to a stable supply of clinically and cost-effective medications. Furthermore, the inclusion of access to pharmacy services under a pharmacare model is key to achieving better health outcomes and cost savings. National Plan for e-Prescribing: CPhA is calling on all parties to work with the provinces/territories, health care professionals and other stakeholders to implement a seamless e-prescribing system in Canada. CPhA is looking for the federal government to support the development and implementation of a common national standard for e-prescribing that ensures that Canadians’ prescription information can be more easily shared and accessed between relevant health providers, while respecting patient privacy and confidentiality. Strengthened National Immunization Strategy for Canada: Given Canada’s relatively low rates of immunization compared with other industrialized countries, CPhA is calling for a revamped National Immunization Strategy. The goal of a revamped strategy would be to increase immunization rates through a comprehensive approach that would include further expanding pharmacists’ scope of practice to administer vaccines. The National Strategy would also target increased research, comparable access and enhanced education/outreach, including building a partnership with the provinces/territories and health professionals to increase public awareness of the importance of vaccinations. In the lead-up to October 19, CPhA is encouraging pharmacists and other Canadians to promote and discuss these key recommendations with political candidates from all parties. To assist you, CPhA has assembled an election website at www.pharmacists.ca/election. On this website, you will find a print-ready brochure that summarizes the key recommendations, a more detailed platform document that provides background and rationale for these recommendations and an online tool that allows you to quickly and easily contact the candidates in your riding and send them messages of support for the above-mentioned priorities. Elections provide voters with an excellent opportunity to learn about and pin down the views of candidates and political parties on specific issues. This election is no different. Go to www.pharmacists.ca/election to share your thoughts with your candidates, and help CPhA advance these core issues. ■
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,404 | 0,222 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».