Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I have known Dr Lindsay for 40 years.He was my teacher, mentor, role model and, ultimately, my partner in the Ross Tilley Burn Centre (Toronto, Ontario).I got to know him really well.He was an excellent teacher.I was his resident for six months in 1975 at the Wellesley Hospital (Toronto, Ontario).He worked very hard.He had a very busy Toronto practice.He also ran a clinic in Sudbury (Ontario) every month and a clinic in Oshawa (Ontario) every two weeks.There were no plastic surgeons in those areas at that time.I don't think he slept very much.I was born and raised on a mushroom farm in rural British Columbia in total poverty.I somehow got to the University of Toronto Medical School and then through the plastic surgery training program.That took 10 years.During that time, I lived in various rooming houses, usually in less than desirable areas.I didn't have a car and sometimes had difficulty raising funds for food.Working with Dr Lindsay provided a new and unique experience.It was a different time and a different place.We didn't have a call schedule.You were the resident for six months.If you wanted time off, then you would have likely been considered a wimp.Even then, you would have missed some cases.Dr Lindsay made up for all our hard work.Two weeks into the rotation, he brought me a box with all his medical books."Keep them for the next 6 months and read up on all our cases" he said.As his resident, you were never a student -you were his associate.He asked questions regularly.If your answer was not correct, then he would simply say "Well, that's a thought".You knew damn well that you had better come up with something better for the next question.He never aspired to that 'disciplinary' method of teaching that was sometimes seen with other surgeons of that era.Dr Lindsay had just opened his surgical clinic in 1975.After our hospital rounds every Saturday morning, we would go to his clinic for soup and to plan the cases for the next week.He actually took me out to dinner on several occasions to places that I had never even imagined!At the end of my rotation, he sent me to a major meeting in Chicago."It's a huge meeting and I think you will learn a lot.Don't worry, I will pay for it!"
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,196 | 0,047 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».