Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Writing in Harper's magazine, Edward Hoagland recently recalled the experience of watching circus performers doing “things they shouldn't reasonably do, with no ostensible purpose but showing off.”1 With total confidence they would perform impossible feats that shocked and amazed, and the shameless flaunting of their physical disfigurements transformed them into figures of pure spectacle. Hoagland gawked without guilt at these almost inhuman figures who, in the same day, against all conceivable reason, “were said to have bought cough medicine, underpants, and other personal stuff in the local stores.” Thus, circus performers simultaneously participated in the mundane world and in total fantasy. In Step Right This Way, the first museum exhibition of Edward J. Kelty's photographs of travelling circus performers (presented at the International Center of Photography in New York from Sept. 13 to Dec. 1, 2002), we witness images that both praise the performers for their audacity and strip away a little of their mystery. The 46 photographs that were included in this show are a mere handful of the circus photos found in Kelty's apartment after his death in 1967. Kelty was never a hugely successful photographer. He had a commercial studio in Manhattan in the 1920s and 30s. What made him unique was his use of a large-format banquet camera and his interest in photographing circus people. During the summer, in a truck that he had outfitted with a darkroom and sleeping area, he would follow small circuses as they criss-crossed the country. With his enormous camera, he was able to produce negatives up to 12” х 20” — ideal for registering the minute detail necessary for images in which he arranged groups of up to a thousand people. By the time the 1940s rolled around many of these small circuses began to disappear, and Kelty moved to Chicago, where he abandoned photography altogether. The discovery of these photos does more than provide a document of the mysterious lost world of the travelling circus. Kelty's photographs were clearly a labour of love. They demonstrate a sensitivity and fondness for the unconventional way of life of circus performers. These circuses were built on the showmanship of the bizarre. The more unusual the feat or physical deformity, the more awe-inspiring and enticing the spectacle. Along with daredevils, dwarfs and giants were other side-show attractions, such as “The Alligator Man,” who suffered from ichthyosis, a disfiguring affliction of the skin. While many other photographers at the time exploited people with rare conditions for personal gain, Kelty demonstrated respect for his subjects. His photographs are of people who convey not only acceptance of their physical abnormalities but a kind of pride, an open flaunting, that might be almost incomprehensible to others. In two separate photos entitled Congress of Freaks, Kelty arranged large numbers of circus performers in rows, each clearly visible and showcasing their unique features in full costume: the hirsute or morbidly obese lady, the contortionist, the albino, the dwarf. These photographs go beyond accepting the bizarre as normal; translating physical oddity into spectacle, they exalt it. With his respectful gaze Kelty was sometimes able to pull his subjects from their fantastical existence and return them to a more understandable world. His large arrangements of circus workers — standing in rows, shortest in front to tallest in back, smiling broadly — are reminiscent of family reunions, wedding parties and school photos. These are poses we have all held at one time or another. On the other hand, other photographs accentuate the extraordinary by eliminating the possibility of forgery or hoax. One photograph shows the x-ray image of a sword-swallower, the handle of the sword hovering above the skull, the blade penetrating deeply through the mouth and throat, and well into the chest. This is a remarkable authentication. It is almost easier to denounce the performer as inhuman than to attempt to believe that any of us might be capable of such a feat. In front of a world where complying with uniformity was expected, circus performers flaunted their uniqueness. In front of audiences that stared with a combination of envy and disapproval, they banded together to create moments of wonder. These visions may have disappeared, but Kelty's images renew our belief in a lost world of the imagination. Jonah Samson Family Medicine Resident St. Michael's Hospital Toronto, Ont.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,045 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».