MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2415007024

Some action on reflection.

2014· editorial· en· W2415007024 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Junaid Sarfraz Khan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2014
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAction (physics)Reflection (computer programming)ReflexivityReflective practicePanacea (medicine)MedicineMeaning (existential)Lifelong learningFeelingEngineering ethicsEpistemologyMedical educationPedagogySociologyPsychologyComputer sciencePsychotherapistAlternative medicineSocial sciencePathology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The healthcare professional in our age needs to PERFORM in complex and challenging healthcare environments. The importance of reflection, reflective practice and teaching and training to develop a reflective practitioner is frequently established in the literature. In fact, recent research on pedagogy stresses the importance of establishing a link between reflective learning and reflective practice as a means to developing adult learning and life long learning skills. Reflection and its three categories of reflection-in-action, reflection-on-action and reflection-on-the-future have been established as the panacea of all things wrong in the health education and health care delivery systems. Activities, therefore, to promote reflection are now being incorporated into undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education, and across a variety of health professions. Many definitions of reflection can be found. Dewey 1 defined reflection as ‘active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further conclusion to which it ends’. This definition shares our understanding of critical thinking. Brockbank and McGill 2 identify reflection as a ‘process or means by which an experience, in the form of thought, feeling or action, is brought into consideration, while it is happening or subsequently’. Secondly, and deriving from the first, ‘the creation of meaning and conceptualisation from experience and the potentiality to look at things as other than they are’. Action can specifically occur before reflection and thus something that requires reflexive ‘action’ and ‘practice’, can occur during reflection (and here on the continuum of action can change or remain unchanged as a result of reflection-in-action) or can be the consequence of reflection-afterprevious-action. The argument related to the balance between action and reflection is not a simple one. How much reflection follows as a result of action and vice versa is largely context, action, and ‘reflector’ dependent. This context, action, reflection, relationship is presented in Table-1. The Upper Right square is the square that represents maximum action with maximum reflection. Again the balance between action and reflection is very situation, subject, experience, context, person and position dependent. Table-1: Context, Action, Reflection, Relationship (CARR) Reflection No Action Reflection Action No Reflection No Action No Reflection Action Reflection, strangely enough, is an in-built reflex mechanism. At least it should be thought of in this way and not as something inhuman and mechanical. There would not be such a person who does not value the part reflection plays in improving professional practice. Schon introduced the concept of a reflective practitioner. Schon states that professional knowledge is limited because it does not take into account the realities of professional life and practice. 3,4 In this time and age, professional knowledge gained by students before entering the profession itself, is made to be as realistic to professional practice as possible. Knowledge before practice does not give the learner the true taste in entirety of the actuality in principle, nevertheless, newer learning techniques and practices like problem based learning, task based learning, community oriented education, work place education give a lot in terms of reality to education before practice. Furthermore, even practice, brings new challenges everyday, which require, intuition, assertion, initiative, reflection and notably action. The addition of the word ‘critically’ to ‘reflective practice’ brings a new dimension to the force of nature that is reflection. It allows the person involved in critical reflective practice, to critically analyse experiences, events, occurrences and knowledge based on the context, situation, relevance, existing knowledge, and attitude (affect) in order to improve his own understanding, action, and attitude towards his practice. Reflective practice is the foundation that supports healthcare delivery systems anywhere in the world. It is through critical reflective practice that we improve our clinical practice, patient encounters and health care delivery. Developing reflective practice is an important component of the training and education of the healthcare professionals and it should form both part of the taught as well as the hidden medical curriculum in Pakistan’s universities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,198

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,016
Communication savante0,0110,012
Science ouverte0,0030,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0590,030

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,348
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed→Même sujetInnovations in Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→