MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2415619242 · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e3181a74756

President's Perspective

2009· article· en· W2415619242 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine J. Sullivan

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCase Reports on Hematomas
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)EndowmentEnthusiasmGloomFellInvestment (military)SpecialtyPolitical scienceEconomicsPsychologyManagementHistoryMedicineLawFamily medicineSocial psychologyPoliticsGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As with the rest of the nation, the Neurology Section has been affected by the economic downturn. For the past 5 years, we have seen our membership grow; increasing 32% since 2003. However, for the first time in a long time, our membership dropped by 2% in the last quarter of 2008. In analyzing this blip on an otherwise steady growth pattern, we learned that many members of AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPISTS ASSOCIATION (APTA) are retaining their membership, but for those who belong to more than one Section, they are dropping membership in some sections to save. A more disappointing blow than the loss of these valued members is the financial hit that our Neurology Section Endowment Fund realized. We have not received the final numbers, but we were informed that, because of these losses, the two scholarships funded by the endowment could not be funded with growth funds this year. The Board's resiliency was further stretched as our new treasurer, Dr. Dennis Fell, reported that our investment account declined in 2008 by $51,078 with $25,500 of that decline occurring in the fourth quarter. Because of this twofold financial setback, the Board has discussed ways to address our time of uncertainty. Luckily, the Neurology Section is not one to perseverate on doom and gloom but rather to take strength and certitude in our mission, commitment of our elected leaders, and the unbridled enthusiasm of our volunteers. As usual, our Section is the sixth largest of the 18 specialty Sections (Orthopedics, Sports, Geriatrics, Pediatrics, and Private Practice, higher respectively); yet, historically we are the second largest number of attendees by Section membership at the annual Combined Sections Meeting (with Orthopedics Section membership attendance typically being the largest). This year at the Combined Sections Meeting in Las Vegas, we had more visits to the Section booth than ever before thanks to our enthusiastic Membership and Public Relations Committee under the leadership of our newly appointed Chair, Dr. Tina Stoeckmann of Marquette University. Even more gratifying than all the visits to our Section booth were the numbers of members looking for ways to get involved. These are uncertain times for nonprofit organizations when individuals are trying to decide how to adjust their personal financial priorities. As with other nonprofit organizations, we are trying to meet the needs of our Section along with the constraints of today's economic climate. Fortunately, resources are available to assist in a Section reality check.1 Step 1: Understand Your Situation At the Board of Directors meetings and the Leadership meeting, where all committee and Special Interest Group chairs are included, we openly discussed the financial legacy of the section along with our current challenges. We agreed that the strategy of growth that has been the emphasis for the strategic plan the past three years, should now be transitioned to one of maintenance because we experience the effects of the current economic climate. However, it should be noted that investments in JNPT, management support from component services at APTA, and updating our website and e-communications have all been wise financial investments that have advanced our mission and strategic plan. Step 2: Mission Is the Cornerstone Without a doubt, multiple sources recommend that nonprofit organizations review their mission and remain mission based and mission driven.2 Our Section has been committed to our Mission, Vision, and Strategic Plan and has made extraordinary gains since the inception of the Strategic Plan in 2006. We acknowledged this year that we stand by our Mission and Vision. Mission To serve neurologic physical therapy providers and to advance evidence-based practice, education, and research in neurologic physical therapy; through dynamic and innovative leadership, our members are empowered to promote optimal recovery, wellness, and quality of life in individuals with movement dysfunction due to neurologic disease or injury. Vision The vision of the Neurology Section is to be a leading partner in the national and international rehabilitation communities by facilitating collaborative relationships, promoting knowledge translation, and influencing policy. Step 3: Set Priorities and Make Choices One of the hardest choices we made this year was to decide to fund one Promotion of Doctoral Study scholarship out of our operating budget in light of the financial losses of our Foundation Endowment Fund. The alternative was to not fund either of the Promotion of Doctoral Studies scholarships for 2009. Funding a doctoral student is a tradition that we want to honor because the Section is committed to bringing evidence to practice and to improving the physical therapy care of individuals with neurologic health conditions. The best method for our nonprofit Section to accomplish this is to support the innovative discovery of our developing clinician scholars. Furthermore, our commitment to educational opportunities is not just limited to doctoral students. One of our strategic priorities of highest concern is to provide educational programming that is accessible and communicated to all our members. Therefore, continued support for regional programming, the home study series, establishing minimal entry-level neurologic competencies for physical therapy education programs, and alternative nonsynchronous learning modules are examples of priorities that are of importance to our membership. Step 4: Develop Strategies One of the greatest risks that we are embarking on at this time is to expand our Board of Directors. The Board recommended to the membership at the 2008 business meeting and the membership voted in favor of a Board expansion to include a Director of Education, Director of Communication, and a Director of Research. Although this does add operational cost, we expect that these leadership positions will be the crucial link in the future growth and have an impact on the Neurology Section both nationally and internationally. We look on this time of “uncertainty” to recognize that we are actually on a continued path of “certainty.” Organizations, such as ours, that are grounded in altruism and solidarity around a common cause will be the ones to continue to thrive during these challenging times. We are a successful example of the “voluntary-spirit model” of nonprofit organizations.2 There is no question that the Neurology Section is a spirited model of active and productive volunteers.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,821
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,306

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neurologic Physical TherapyMême sujetCase Reports on HematomasTravaux en français237 207