Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sarah Davies and James Harris, eds. Stalin. A New History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005. xiii, 295pp. Index. £40, cloth. £18.99, paper.The volume under review, based on the proceedings of a conference held at Durham University shortly before the fiftieth anniversary of Stalin's death, contains fourteen contributions by experts on Stalin and Stalinism. The book's aim-to reinvigorate scholarly interest in Stalin-is admirably achieved, for there is not a weak essay in the collection. The contributions are placed in a roughly chronological framework, ranging from Stalin's formative years in Georgia (Alfred Rieber) to his writings on science and economics during the Cold War (Ethan Pollock). The core of the book focuses on Stalin's wielding of political power: Commissar of Nationalities (Jeremy Smith), General secretary (James Harris), Prime Minister (J. Arch Getty), dictator (Oleg Khlevniuk), the maker of foreign policy (Alfred Rieber), Marxist ideologue (Erick van Ree) and Bolshevik romantic (David Priestland).In his account of Stalin's youth and politicization, Alfred Rieber demythologizes much of the accepted canon: Stalin was not expelled from the Tiflis seminary for Marxist propaganda but struck off because of his failure to sit exams, even though his first contact to the workers was through another seminarian, Lado Ketskhoveli, who had been expelled from the school four years before Stalin left it voluntarily. Rieber demonstrates that Stalin was originally a populist, deeply influenced by heroic Georgian tales of social banditry, and converted to Marxism much later than his hagiographers stated. Jeremy Smith analyses Stalin in the Commissariat for Nationalities, his differences with Lenin on federalism (Georgian crisis 1922) and his belief in Russian superiority. According to James Harris, Stalin, as General secretary, appointed officials who vociferously supported him in choking off internal debate and eliminating signs of Oppositional' activity.In his focussed study of Stalin as Prime Minister, J. Arch Getty examines how the Politburo functioned and sees parallels to Western cabinets (United Kingdom): having to decide an increasing number of decisions for complex societies, so that many measures are agreed upon by small groups prior to the actual sittings. Getty makes two other vital points: that the personal authority of Politburo members did not depend on the size of the fiefdoms they administered but on the nature of their personal relationship to Stalin; and that his lieutenants were strong figures in their own right, battling with one another for budgetary concessions and prestige, before submitting to Stalin's arbitration. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».