Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 53-year-old woman with a history of metastatic breast cancer was admitted 12 days following her sixth cycle of capecitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy because of hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and dehydration. Prolonged diarrhea followed the chemotherapy and may have contributed to the development of hypokalemia. The chemotherapy protocol was suspended, and the patient received fluid support, potassium, and calcium carbonate supplements. Urine microscopy detected yeast, subsequently identified as Candida glabrata by urine culture, and the patient was treated with fluconazole.Four days later, this immunosuppressed patient developed a sore swollen tongue. An oral infection by herpes simplex virus was presumed, and treatment with acyclovir was initiated as follows: day 1, 200 mg oral every 5 hours; days 2 through 4, 400 mg intravenous every 8 hours. On the fourth day of acyclovir treatment, a random urine specimen was submitted for chemical and microscopic urinalysis. The urine was cloudy and yellow with a high specific gravity level (>1.030), low pH (5.5), and a glucose level of 0.1 g/dL (5.5 mmol/L); there was a strong reaction for blood (+++) and protein (100 mg/dL), but no reaction for ketones, nitrite, or leukocyte esterase (Multistix 8 SG, Bayer Inc, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada). Microscopy of the urine sediment revealed abundant, colorless, transparent, fine-needle–shaped crystals and a few red blood cells and yeast cells (Figure 1). The crystals had either sharp ends or blunt ends and had red-green birefringence in polarized light (Figure 2). The large quantity of crystals caused the cloudy appearance of the fluid and suggested radiographic contrast material or drug-associated crystalluria. The laboratory medical staff was consulted when the ward staff denied that the patient had had recent radiology studies or antibiotic therapy. Following review of pharmaceutical use and patient history, the possibility of acyclovir crystalluria was considered likely.This case presented 2 teaching points. First, acyclovir crystalluria is a rare side effect of a very commonly used drug. While there are few published reports that specifically describe this crystalluria, acyclovir-induced renal failure was observed in 58 of 354 patients following intravenous drug administration.1 It is surprising that acyclovir crystalluria is seldom observed. Drug-induced crystalluria is frequently observed in tertiary-care centers, and it is important to remember that prompt attention to this urine microscopy observation can help avoid drug-associated renal toxicity.The second teaching point was that desktop electronic access to medical literature had a positive influence on this patient's care. A quick search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database for acyclovir crystalluria identified 4 previous reports and also indicated that acyclovir treatment has a risk of nephrotoxicity due to renal tubular damage by crystals.2–5 The shape and properties of the crystals we observed were consistent with acyclovir but were not sufficiently unique to allow identification.2–4 The suspicion of acyclovir crystalluria was noted on the urinalysis report and in consultation with the attending physician. Two days later, the patient's medical chart contained a review article on drug-induced crystalluria and renal failure obtained via electronic access to medical journals by the oncology staff; acyclovir treatment for this patient was discontinued and the crystalluria resolved within 24 hours with no indication of renal toxicity based on the creatinine levels. This scenario of using desktop access to medical literature to rapidly and conveniently research unusual observations is becoming routine practice among many pathologists, clinicians, and patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».