[Curative effects of kinesitherapy in combination with self-made simple orthosis in treatment of scar contracture of burned hand in children].
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To survey the curative effects of kinesitherapy in combination with self-made simple orthosis (SO) in treatment of scar contracture of burned hand in children. METHODS: Fifty-eight children with burns of unilateral hand and received treatment in our rehabilitation center from January 2012 to January 2014 were divided into common rehabilitation (CR) and SO groups according to the random number table, with 29 cases in each group. After the wounds were healed, patients in group CR were treated with kinesitherapy combined with hand game exercises and pressure gloves, while patients in group SO were treated with kinesitherapy combined with hand game exercises and self-made SO, which was composed of finger web dividing belt, self-adhesive bandage, and infusion set fixing plate. Before treatment and 16 weeks after treatment, scar condition was assessed with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS); hand function was evaluated by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function, and the completion time was recorded; and the activities of daily life (ADL) was measured by the modified Barthel Index. Sixteen weeks after treatment, the range of motion was measured with the Total Active Movement (TAM) method. Data were processed with t test and chi-square test. RESULTS: The score of VSS in group SO was (12.2 ± 1.3) points before treatment and (6.7 ± 2.2) points 16 weeks after treatment, and the improvement score was (5.6 ± 1.8) points. The score of VSS in group CR was (12.0 ± 1.4) points before treatment and (7.0 ± 1.8) points 16 weeks after treatment, and the improvement score was (5.0 ± 1.0) points. There was no obvious difference in improvement score of VSS between the two groups (t = 1.452, P = 0.152). The ratio of excellent and good results according to TAM method in group SO was 75.9% (22/29) , while it was 37.9% (11/29) in group CR (t = 8.507, P = 0.004). The completion time for the Jebsen Test of group OS was (8.2 ± 1.6) min before treatment and (7.1 ± 1.4) min after treatment, and the improvement time was (1.2 ± 1.5) min. The completion time for the Jebsen Test of group CR was (9.0 ± 1.9) min before treatment and (6.3 ± 1.4) min 16 weeks after treatment, and the improvement time was (2.7 ± 2.7) min. There was a significant difference in improvement time for the Jebsen Test between the two groups (t = 2.618, P = 0.012). The score of ADL in group CR was (7.7 ± 1.4) points before treatment and (10.4 ± 1.4) points 16 weeks after treatment, and the improvement score was (2.7 ± 1.7) points. The score of ADL in group CR was (7.8 ± 1.4) points before treatment and (9.5 ± 1.4) points 16 weeks after treatment, and the improvement score was (1.7 ± 1.6) points. There was a significant difference in improvement score of ADL between the two groups (t = 2.246, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Kinesitherapy in combination with self-made SO can improve the functional recovery of burned hand in children and prevent contractures in hand, and it is worth applying generally.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».