MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2416200807 · doi:10.1097/00005176-200308000-00028

Breast Milk and Childhood Obesity: The Czechs Weigh In

2003· letter· en· W2416200807 sur OpenAlexaff
Christian Braegger

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2003
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Établissements canadiensBishop's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOverweightMedicineObesityPercentileChildhood obesityDemographyBreast feedingCzechPediatricsBreast milkInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Overweight and Obesity in 6-to 14-Year-Old Czech Children in 1991: Protective Effect of Breast-Feeding. Toschke AM, Vignerova J, Lhotska L, Osancova K, Koletzko B, and vonKries R. J Pediatr 2002;141:764–9. Summary: This is a cross-sectional study of survey data collected in 1991 in the Czech Republic on 33,768 school-aged children 6 to 14 years old (1). Retrospective data on the duration of breast-feeding was collected at the time of the survey, although no distinction was made between exclusive and partial breast-feeding. Overall, 97.7% of parents completed the questionnaires, and 90.7% of families breast-fed their children at least partially. Height and weight were measured in school by physical education teachers with similar equipment. Children were classified as overweight (BMI >90th percentile) or obese (BMI >97th percentile) based upon within-sample cut-off ranges. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was lower in breast-fed infants compared with never breast-fed infants [overweight: 0.80 (0.71–0.90); obesity: 0.80 (0.66–0.96)]. Nevertheless, the differences were relatively small (i.e., obesity among breast-fed children was 4.4% compared with 3.2% for never breast-fed children). Similar effects of breast-feeding on weight status were seen at all ages and were independent of parental education, obesity, maternal smoking, television viewing, and physical activity. However, parental obesity [OR: 3.46 (3.07–3.90)], high birth weight [OR: 1.93 (1.62–2.31)], daily television hours [OR: 1.49 (1.32–1.69)], and sports participation [OR: 0.53 (0.46–0.62)] were all better predictors of childhood obesity than was exposure to breast milk. Comment: This large epidemiologic study provides descriptive evidence of an association between breast-feeding in infancy and a lower prevalence of childhood obesity. The findings agree with three other large, epidemiologic studies (Fig. 1) relating breast-feeding in infancy to a lower prevalence of later obesity (2–4). The highly consistent results from different study populations provide strong evidence for the statement that breast-feeding protects against obesity.FIG. 1.: Studies relating breast-feeding in infancy to a lower prevalence of later obesity.There are many possible explanations for the apparent protective effect of breast-feeding against obesity. Infants who breast-feed may be better able to regulate the amount of milk they consume than formula-fed infants. Feeding behavior of breast-fed infants is largely dependent on the infant, whereas feeding behavior of formula-fed infants may be more dependent on parental expectations. The increased length and weight of formula-fed infants in infancy (5) certainly suggests that formula-fed infants are overfed. Evidence is accumulating that both prenatal and postnatal exposure of infants to varied flavors affects infant feeding behavior (6). Specifically, infants who had exposure to the flavor of carrots in either amniotic fluid or breast milk reacted less negatively when offered carrot-flavored cereal and appeared to enjoy the cereal more than did the nonexposed control subjects. Studies by Sullivan and Birch suggest that breast-fed infants are more adventuresome in sampling previously untasted foods (7). Because the taste of breast milk varies considerably, depending on the maternal diet (8), infants who are breast-fed may be more likely to accept fruits and vegetables when they are introduced during infancy or early childhood. There is speculation that breast milk may contain bioactive factors that alter fat deposition or energy expenditure. The physiologic significance of leptin, insulin-like growth factors, somatostatin, and other growth-related hormones in breast milk also remains uncertain. Nevertheless, differences in endocrine response to breast milk and formula feeding have been documented (9). For example, the increased glucose and insulin levels in the breast milk of mothers with diabetes may actually increase the risk of subsequent obesity in childhood (10). A note of caution needs to be sounded about accepting the results of any large, epidemiologic study. Rather than being causally related to later protection against obesity, the presence of breast-feeding may actually be a marker for other factors related to leanness. The authors argue that the relatively homogeneous living conditions in Czechoslovakia in the 1970s and 1980s minimized the effect of confounding social factors on the breast-feeding/obesity relationship they found. However, the actual timing of the study in 1991, 2 years after the “Velvet Revolution” when the Czech economy entered a sharp decline, raises the possibility that social and economic differences among families may have produced the study results. The fact that only 9.3% of children in the current study were never breast-fed raises the concern that families who breast-fed their children were significantly different from those who did not breast-feed. In this study, the children who were not breast-fed were more likely to watch TV for longer hours per day, were less likely to eat fruit, and were more likely to have parents who were obese, of lower education, and who smoked. The lack of a direct relationship between leanness and duration of breast-feeding also argues against a direct protective effect of breast milk. In this study, children breast-fed for less than 1 month had lower rates of later obesity than did children breast-fed for more than 6 months. In summary, this epidemiologic study supports the hypothesis that breast-feeding protects against later childhood obesity. While the overall impact of breast-feeding on childhood obesity may be small in comparison to other modifiable risk factors, the evidence of long-term benefit provided in this study is a welcome buttress to the recommendation we make daily (i.e., that breast-feeding is the best nutrition for infants). Richard Strauss UMG Department of Pediatric GI New Brunswick, New Jersey

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,052
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,103

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionMême sujetObesity, Physical Activity, DietTravaux en français237 207