Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Maintenance of Certification (MOC or MAINCERT) program of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) became a reality on January 1, 2001. Physicians have, thus, all had to decide how they, as individuals, are going to keep track of MAINCERT activities. The present paper assumes that readers have decided to use computer-assisted recording and submission of MAINCERT activity hours to the RCPSC as the primary methods of record keeping and submission (Table 1). Framework of educational (continuing professional development [CPD]) options of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Rounds, journal clubs Workshops, courses, conferences Distance education programs Nonaccredited rounds and meetings Reading journals and texts Information (MEDLINE) searches Audiotapes and videotapes Computer and Internet continuing medical education Self-assessment programs developed or sponsored by national specialty societies, faculties and colleges Training or virtual reality simulators used for the purpose of self-assessment Personal learning projects generated from participating in a CPD activity in another section Keeping a learning portfolio Traineeships, preceptored courses, Masters and PhD studies Practice audits and patient surveys Institution audits, incident reports, utilization studies Other care appraisal studies (based on the practices of peers) Publications (eg, manuscript reviews) Preparation of presentations, teaching, examinations (question writing) Research (eg, grant proposals and trials) Setting standards (clinical practice guidelinedevelopment) Rounds, journal clubs Workshops, courses, conferences Distance education programs Nonaccredited rounds and meetings Reading journals and texts Information (MEDLINE) searches Audiotapes and videotapes Computer and Internet continuing medical education Self-assessment programs developed or sponsored by national specialty societies, faculties and colleges Training or virtual reality simulators used for the purpose of self-assessment Personal learning projects generated from participating in a CPD activity in another section Keeping a learning portfolio Traineeships, preceptored courses, Masters and PhD studies Practice audits and patient surveys Institution audits, incident reports, utilization studies Other care appraisal studies (based on the practices of peers) Publications (eg, manuscript reviews) Preparation of presentations, teaching, examinations (question writing) Research (eg, grant proposals and trials) Setting standards (clinical practice guidelinedevelopment) Reproduced with permission from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (1) Framework of educational (continuing professional development [CPD]) options of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Rounds, journal clubs Workshops, courses, conferences Distance education programs Nonaccredited rounds and meetings Reading journals and texts Information (MEDLINE) searches Audiotapes and videotapes Computer and Internet continuing medical education Self-assessment programs developed or sponsored by national specialty societies, faculties and colleges Training or virtual reality simulators used for the purpose of self-assessment Personal learning projects generated from participating in a CPD activity in another section Keeping a learning portfolio Traineeships, preceptored courses, Masters and PhD studies Practice audits and patient surveys Institution audits, incident reports, utilization studies Other care appraisal studies (based on the practices of peers) Publications (eg, manuscript reviews) Preparation of presentations, teaching, examinations (question writing) Research (eg, grant proposals and trials) Setting standards (clinical practice guidelinedevelopment) Rounds, journal clubs Workshops, courses, conferences Distance education programs Nonaccredited rounds and meetings Reading journals and texts Information (MEDLINE) searches Audiotapes and videotapes Computer and Internet continuing medical education Self-assessment programs developed or sponsored by national specialty societies, faculties and colleges Training or virtual reality simulators used for the purpose of self-assessment Personal learning projects generated from participating in a CPD activity in another section Keeping a learning portfolio Traineeships, preceptored courses, Masters and PhD studies Practice audits and patient surveys Institution audits, incident reports, utilization studies Other care appraisal studies (based on the practices of peers) Publications (eg, manuscript reviews) Preparation of presentations, teaching, examinations (question writing) Research (eg, grant proposals and trials) Setting standards (clinical practice guidelinedevelopment) Reproduced with permission from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (1) This paper also assumes that readers have decided to do more than simply record their hours on the RCPSC Web site, the Web Diary. The Web Diary comprises a two-pronged approach: active learning via the Web Diary (not only does one record the hours spent solving or learning about a clinical or research problem, but also records how that will change everyday decision-making); and registering the number of hours in the RCPSC's MAINCERT categories. The following items are needed to access MAINCERT: The capacity to access the Internet with a home or office computer, preferably with a personal computer and not a MacIntosh computer. The latter is not supported by MAINCERT software at this time. The Web site address . The RCPSC Web site is reached automatically from this site. Identification numbers (IDs) and passwords. The ID number for both the Web Diary and the RCPSC Web sites is your RCPSC ID. The Web Diary password is personalized on your first visit to the site (follow the directions), and the RCPSC password is your last name, eg, Francoeur. If you belong to a virtual, private network (such as some university systems) that have globally turned off ‘cookies’ (small computer files transferred by WebMD to your computer's hard drive to allow for aggregate data use), then you will not be able to access WebMD without fancy technical adjustments. Access the Web Diary site . Enter your ID number. Enter your personalized password. Click on ‘Login’. Click on ‘Other CPD activities’. Click on ‘Add a CPD activity’. Fill in the following boxes: title; section code, time spent, etc (use the ‘cascading arrows’); and write in personal notes in the comments box to yourself about the learning activity. Click on the white box entitled ‘RCPSC link’. Enter your ID number. Enter your password (ie, your last name). Click on ‘English’ or ‘French’. Maximize your screen. After choosing ‘Submit hours for maintenance of certification’, click on ‘Go’. Enter the number of hours spent on the CPD activity in the appropriate category. Click on ‘Submit hours’ and you will see the summary page. Do not click on ‘Back’ on your Web browser. If you wish to enter more hours, click on ‘Return to Web entry form’. Close the ‘RCPSC Profile Summary’ dialogue box. This will return you to your Web Diary. ‘Check’ off ‘Record submitted’. Click on ‘Save’, or if you are finished, click on ‘Save and Exit’. To add another activity, click on ‘Other CPD activities’ written in cursive type near the top of the page. Then click on ‘Add a CPD activity’ and start over. Hopefully, in the near future (Fall 2001), the ‘RCPSC link’ will be automated so that Web Diary entries will automatically enter your MAINCERT summary page. Good luck!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,175 | 0,086 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».