Tanning Attitudes That Predict the Prevalence and Frequency of Tanning bed use in Older Adolescents and Young Adults in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Tanning bed use is a modifiable risk factor in the development of \nmelanoma skin cancer. Despite the increased risk of skin cancer, tanning bed use is most \ncommon among the adolescent and young adult population. Adolescents and young \nadults intentionally expose their skin to the artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted \nfrom tanning equipment. In Canada, the indoor tanning industry is largely unregulated \nand in need of a coordinated public health intervention. \nObjectives: The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence and \nfrequency of tanning bed use in the past 12 months and to identify the tanning attitudes \nthat predict the prevalence and higher frequency of tanning bed use in the past 12 months \nin the older adolescent and young adult population in Canada. The purpose of the study \nwas to identify key points of intervention and to provide valuable information to help \ninform policy makers and health promotion workers when developing a strategy to \nreduce exposure to artificial UV radiation. \nMethods: The study used the data collected in the 2006 Second National Sun \nSurvey (NSS2), the most recent and comprehensive survey in Canada to examine \nexposure to UV radiation. A logistic regression and negative binomial regression model \nwas used to predict the prevalence and higher frequency of tanning bed use in the past 12 \nmonths among older adolescents and young adults (aged 16 to 34) in the 2006 NSS2, \nrespectively. \nResults: Overall, 21.5% of females and 8.3% of males (aged 16 to 34) in Canada \nwere found to have had used artificial tanning equipment at least once in the past 12 \nmonths in 2006. Among those who had used a tanning bed in the past 12 months, 7.0% of \niv \nfemales and 10.3% of males had used the equipment once, compared to 41.3% of females \nand 29.2% of males who had used the equipment more than 12 times. \nThe individual level determinants that predict any use of a tanning bed in the past \n12 months include gender (female), ethnicity (white), the intent to suntan during the \nsummer months (always or often), the belief that people look better with a tan, and the \nbelief that you look more attractive with a tan. In addition, having skin that will freckle \n(no suntan) when repeatedly exposed to sunlight was negatively associated with any use \nof a tanning bed in the past 12 months. The belief that a tan gives a healthy outdoor look, \non the other hand, did not predict any tanning bed use in the past 12 months. Among \nthose who had used a tanning bed in the past 12 months, the individual level determinants \nthat predict the higher frequency of tanning bed use include gender (female), skin that \nwill moderately tan when repeatedly exposed to sunlight, the use of a tanning bed to look \nbetter (reported as ‘very important’), and the use of a tanning bed to relax or feel better \n(reported as ‘very important’). The use of a tanning bed to boost their immune system, to \nprotect against cancer, and to get vitamin D did not predict the higher frequency of \ntanning bed use in the past 12 months. \nConclusion: Tanning bed use in the older adolescent and young adult population \nis a significant and growing public health concern both in Canada and worldwide. The \nappearance-related motivation to use a tanning bed, but not the health-related motivation \nto use a tanning bed, is predictive of tanning bed use and is a key point of intervention. \nThe tobacco industry is similar to the indoor tanning industry; however, tobacco control \nefforts have led to the development of evidence-based policies, which may provide a \nframework to reduce tanning bed use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».