Opening Minds: The Mental Health Commission of Canada’s Anti-Stigma Initiative: Preface
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fear of being stigmatized or labelled is a major reason that many people living with a mental illness will not seek help. They report stigma is more life-limiting and disabling than the illness itself. Stigma can mean being excluded by friends and family, being discriminated against by health care professionals, and being treated unfairly in the workplace. In 2001, the World Health Organization declared stigma as “the single most important barrier to overcome.”1, p 98 As part of its 10-year mandate, the Mental Health Commission of Canada embarked on an anti-stigma initiative called Opening Minds (OM) to change the attitudes and behaviours of Canadians toward people with a mental illness and to encourage people and organizations to eliminate discrimination. Launched in 2009, OM is the largest systematic effort undertaken in Canadian history to reduce the stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness. OM has taken a targeted and evidence-based approach, initially reaching out to health care providers, youth, the workforce, and news media. OM’s philosophy is not to reinvent the wheel, but rather to build on the strengths of existing programs from across the county. As a result, OM has actively sought out such programs, few of which have been scientifically evaluated for their effectiveness. Now partnering with more than 100 organizations, OM has conducted evaluations of the programs to determine their effectiveness at reducing stigma. OM’s goal is to replicate successful programs nationally. A key component of programs being evaluated is contact-based educational sessions, where target audiences hear personal stories from and interact with people who have recovered or are successfully managing their mental illness. The success of contact-based anti-stigma interventions has been generally supported in international studies as a promising practice to reduce stigma. OM’s numerous partner programs, sponsoring organizations, and research teams provide a powerful and growing network across Canada that is reaching out nationally to make a real difference in the effort to reduce stigma. Up to this point, most groups attempting to tackle stigma have principally used social marketing campaigns; however, this approach has not proven to be effective in the long term. Instead, OM has chosen a different strategy, one that has shown considerable success in breaking down the stigma barrier across the target groups identified. This supplement is intended to provide an overview of the activities that have been conducted by the OM research teams. It includes a study2 that identifies the key ingredients of successful anti-stigma interventions for health care providers. It is based on the evaluation of more than 20 programs directed at this professional group. Also included is a paper3 that presents results of the first population survey of stigma in Canada. This study found youth aged 12 to 25 reported the highest level of personal stigma. The final paper4 in this supplement explores the factors that could serve as the basic requirements for an anti-stigma program to produce sufficient savings to pay for itself.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,040 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».