MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2425195072

Anaplasmosis in a dog on Vancouver Island.

2015· article· en· W2425195072 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Kowalski, Diane Cruickshank, Malcolm Macartney

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueVector-borne infectious diseases
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLethargyLamenessMedicinePalpationPhysical examinationLabrador RetrieverVeterinary medicineSurgeryAnatomyInternal medicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In February of 2015, a 7-year-old, 33 kg, spayed female Labrador retriever dog was presented to our hospital with a 1-day duration of decreased appetite, lethargy, and a stiff and stilted gate. She had vomited once the previous day and the owners mentioned that she may have ingested something from the garbage. This dog also had a history of acquiring several ticks within the previous 2 wk and that 2 ticks had been removed by the owners just prior to her examination. The Pacific deer tick, Ixodes pacificus, is commonly encountered on dogs in this area of Vancouver Island in 2 seasonal periods; a winter (January–February) spike and then throughout the summer (June through September). This dog had no history of travel off Vancouver Island. On distant examination, this dog had an obvious right hind leg lameness with a shifting of weight from this limb while walking. There were no obvious neurological deficits. Her temperature was 40.3°C, her heart rate was 170 beats/min, and her respiratory rate was normal. Her mucous membranes were pink and mildly tacky. There was no discernible pain or abnormalities on abdominal palpation. An orthopedic examination revealed no obvious pain response on flexion or extension of any limbs, nor any obvious swelling of any joints. Abdominal radiographs were taken and in-house complete blood (cell) count (CBC) and serum chemistry were performed. The radiographs revealed spondylosis of several lumbar vertebrae but no other skeletal or soft tissue abnormalities were detected. The chemistry panel was unremarkable with all parameters within normal range. The CBC, however, revealed severe thrombocytopenia [18 × 109/L, reference interval (RI): 148 to 484 × 109/L] and the blood smear showed no platelet clumping to skew this finding. There was a leukopenia (3.6 × 109/L, RI: 5.05 to 16.76 ×109/L) with a notable lymphopenia (0.24 × 109/L, RI: 1.05 to 5.19 × 109/L), an absolute eosinopenia, and a normal neutrophil count (3.5 × 109/L, RI: 2.95 to 11.64 × 109/L). The red cell count was normal (7.0 × 1012/L, RI: 5.65 to 8.87 ± 109/L). Upon examination of the blood smear, it was readily apparent that there were cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (morulae, Figure 1) present in the neutrophils (seen in 27 out of 100 neutrophils counted). Figure 1 Blood smear showing morulae (cluster of bacteria) in a neutrophil. A tentative diagnosis of anaplasmosis was made based on the history, clinical signs, and findings on the blood smear (1,2). Treatment included doxycycline 300 mg, q12h for 14 d and prednisone 12.5 mg, q12h for 5 d, then q24h for 7 d. Serum was sent to Idexx Laboratory for a 4Dx SNAP test which is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test for the presence of circulating antibodies to Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. platys, Ehrlichia canis, and E. ewingii, Borrellia burgdorferi, and Dirofilaria antigen. The results were negative for all organisms. Upon consultation with the reference laboratory, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Anaplasma spp. DNA was performed on the same serum sample. This test was positive for Anaplasma DNA, thus confirming the tentative diagnosis. The patient improved significantly after a few days of therapy and had an uneventful recovery. This case is similar in many respects to a previously documented case of anaplasmosis in a dog on Vancouver Island (3). Clinicians are reminded that screening tests for antibodies may prove negative when animals present in the acute phase of anaplasmosis which may last 7 to 14 d (2,4) and that laboratory confirmation for the presence of DNA may be required to confirm presence of the organism. There are several reports of dogs that were positive by PCR but negative in tests for antibody to Anaplasma, including a recent report on 3 dogs from Saskatoon (5). In addition, there is a general sense that in many areas of North America, including southern Vancouver Island, ticks are more prevalent and the incidence of tick bites in dogs appears to be increasing. Veterinarians are advised to be vigilant in testing for tick-borne diseases in dogs with a history of illness following tick exposure. Veterinary technicians viewing smears in-house need to be aware that the presence of inclusion bodies in neutrophils is a significant clue in the diagnosis of anaplasmosis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,183
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,363

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetVector-borne infectious diseasesTravaux en français237 207