MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W242712722

Book review: Veiled meanings

2002· article· en· W242712722 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Gordon

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaReading (process)Perspective (graphical)DiseasePsychologyMedicineStyle (visual arts)PsychoanalysisHistoryLinguisticsPhilosophyPathologyComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The experience of Alzheimer's disease: life through a tangled veil Steven R. Sabat Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: Oxford; 2001 368 pp. US$26.95 ISBN 0-63121-666-9 It's not often that I encounter a book that changes the way I look at a clinical problem, especially one so familiar to me as Alzheimer's disease. With 25 years' experience as a geriatrician, I had become comfortable with the concepts and issues surrounding the care of people with dementia. And so, although I welcomed the opportunity to review Steven Sabat's The Experience of Alzheimer's Disease, I was not prepared for the impact it would have on my perspective of people afflicted with this disease. Sabat's approach and writing style are very engaging. The basis for his cogent and perceptive observations is clinical cases that he has been deeply involved with over a long period. From these he postulates a dynamic that allows the reader and, one hopes, treating clinicians to focus not on the deficiencies suffered by people with Alzheimer's disease, but rather on their remaining and often very substantial strengths. His special interest in language difficulties, a well-recognized component of Alzheimer's dementia, makes for illuminating reading. Interspersed with clinical vignettes, which are rich with recorded dialogue, are observations and interpretations of these encounters. Throughout his dialogues and commentaries Sabat repeatedly emphasizes that healthy others in the afflicted person's world (e.g., family, friends and professional care providers) may position him or her primarily as a member of a group such as “the demented,” or “Alzheimer's patient” and thereby overlook, or pay less heed to, other qualities in which that person may take pride. Once such an attribution is made, it is very difficult for all concerned to see the individual person any more, for the fate of the categorized individual may be lost in the stereotype. Sabat emphasizes the importance of looking for “meaning” in the communication of patients with Alzheimer's. What may seem as erratic, agitated or confused behaviour may result from the listener's failure to discern the meaning behind certain actions, which the patient cannot express because of language problems. He also notes something that I have come to appreciate in my clinical practice. When people are emotionally aroused or worried, “the ability to process and retain information is often compromised. For the Alzheimer sufferer, the situation is even worse.” It is often a busy clinician who provides the framework for cognitive testing, and because of a combination of the patient's anxiety and the physician's haste, the process of communication and diagnostic evaluation may be suboptimal. Even during interactions with family members and other caregivers, the patient's anxiety and a sense of the listener's impatience can result in greater agitation and apparent confusion. By combining clinical vignettes and commentary, Sabat draws the reader into the lives and minds of the subjects who provide material for his reflections. They become vibrant characters whose experiences of and observations on their own disease progress is sometimes very poignant. It is clear from the text of the interviews, and from Sabat's uncanny ability to help translate the sometimes-garbled sentences into meaningful dialogue, that the people we encounter in this book are far more capable than most clinicians would tend to assume. I found myself realizing that I, too, have ignored or dismissed efforts to communicate of the kind Sabat captures so well. Even in the midst of reading this book for review, I started to communicate differently with patients with Alzheimer's disease and their families. I began to take note of evidence of strengths in my patients and evidence of impatience and the misreading of cues by caring family members. I noted that families sometimes took the lead from long-term hired caregivers, who often seemed to be better at understanding the meaning behind garbled words. The best of these caregivers seemed to exhibit extraordinary gentleness and a respect for the person imprisoned in the Alzheimer's persona. This is a “must read” for any practitioner whose clientele includes patients with Alzheimer's disease. Sabat's book is unlike others that recount personal and family experiences, or professional works that help practitioners understand the mechanisms of the disease. It combines humanity, humility and a clear conceptual framework that can be put to practical use. While captivating the reader, Sabat provides insights that can be extremely helpful in clinical practice and program development. His fundamental message is that each person afflicted with Alzheimer's disease is an individual whose special essence we must endeavour to find and to nurture for as long as possible

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,101
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,339

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0140,008
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1010,057

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association JournalMême sujetCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsTravaux en français237 207