MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2427168265 · doi:10.1097/01.jaa.0000453240.00098.83

Physician assistants in the Netherlands

2014· article· en· W2427168265 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Quinten van den Driesschen, Frank de Roo

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAPA · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueNursing Roles and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEurosAccreditationHealth careEconomic shortageFamily medicineMedicineChristian ministryImmigrationNursingPolitical scienceMedical educationHumanitiesGovernment (linguistics)Law

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FigureFigureThis November, the Netherlands Association of Physician Assistants (NAPA) celebrates its 10th anniversary with a 3-day international symposium in Amsterdam (http://www.pa-invest.nl). The first four PAs were introduced in the Netherlands at the end of 2001; this year, the number of Dutch PAs will exceed 1,000. In each of the next few years, 150 to 200 PAs will complete their program. Unlike in other countries, the Netherlands was not prompted to introduce PAs by a shortage of physicians or rural areas lacking healthcare facilities. This country of 17 million has about 60,000 physicians, and all inhabitants are covered by healthcare insurance for a contribution of 360 Euros (about $489 US) per person per year. Everyone is registered with a general practitioner's office, which refers patients when needed to physicians; most physicians work in hospitals, as do about 75% of Dutch PAs. HISTORY OF THE PROFESSION The Dutch PA profession traces its history to the late 1990s, when the Dutch ministry of health foresaw a future shortage of all healthcare workers and studied different solutions to keep costs in control and find new career opportunities for healthcare workers. Physicians thought that PAs could help alleviate problems with continuity of medical residents on hospital units and in outpatient clinics. Experts also visited the United States to learn from the experience of the American PA profession.1 The first PA program, which was not accredited, was organized in Utrecht in 2001 by a few physicians and was led by cardiothoracic surgeon Aart Brutel de la Riviere. The first students graduated in 2004. The first accredited Dutch PA programs began in 2003 in Nijmegen and Utrecht. Three new PA programs were started in 2004 in Amsterdam, Groningen, and Rotterdam, bringing the total number of PA programs in the Netherlands to five. These programs are accredited at the master's level by the Accreditation Organisation of the Netherlands and Flanders. PA EDUCATION Dutch PA programs are 30 months long and educate students in a broad range of medical care and competencies. PA students must have a healthcare-related bachelor's degree and at least 2 years of clinical work experience in the healthcare domain.2 The programs incorporate a dual work-education model, which means that students are employed within a particular medical specialty 2 days per week, under the supervision of a mentor physician, while enrolled in the master's PA program.2 The students undertake didactic and clinical education within this medical specialty from the beginning until the end of the curriculum. This model is very successful because in addition to teaching students it assures them of a job after graduation. Dutch PAs conduct low- to moderately complex medical tasks within certain specialties, both in primary and secondary care.2 Since January 2012, PAs are authorized to indicate and perform predefined medical procedures and prescribe medications without supervision.2 The scope of practice will be reevaluated in 2017.2 “Physician assistant” is a protected title by law, under the Dutch Individual Health Care Professions Act, meaning that all registered Dutch PAs are licensed to practice.2 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION NAPA has played an important role in the success of the Dutch PA profession. Founded by students in 2004, NAPA collaborates with PA programs, government, and medical professional organizations to promote the PA profession. Registration was introduced by NAPA in 2009 following the same rules as physician registration; both professions require continuing medical education as a condition of licensure. NAPA also provides a successful model for other European countries that are considering developing a PA profession, and has collaborated with the United Kingdom and Germany. WORLDWIDE COLLABORATION Studying the different PA curricula in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, and the different job descriptions, we see that the profession is performed at the same level in these countries. But can PAs practice in a country other than the one in which they were educated? What are the obstacles? How can these be solved? Is there a mutual interest to look for means to prove equality? We found no documents about special regulations on employability. However the Dutch PA title is protected in the Netherlands, where the government decides whether to recognize foreign diplomas. International collaboration by PA professional organizations (such as that being considered by the American, Canadian, United Kingdom, and Netherlands PA associations) may help expand employment opportunities for PAs across borders. RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES Few studies have been done on PAs in the Netherlands.3-7 More studies are in development or in progress on the cost-effectiveness of PAs, billing by PAs, best practices, and which procedures should be reserved for physicians. Additional studies are needed to strengthen the position of PAs in the Dutch healthcare system. Here, too, collaboration is needed on international professional and educational standards.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,584
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,465

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,436
Écart entre enseignants0,388 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAPAMême sujetNursing Roles and PracticesTravaux en français237 207