TO THE PROBLEM OF BIOFORTIFICATION AND DIVERSIFICATION OF LENTIL CROP Kondykov I.V. , Candidate of Agricultural Sciences
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
UDC 635.658:631.527:581.19 TO THE PROBLEM OF BIOFORTIFICATION AND DIVERSIFICATION OF LENTIL CROP Kondykov I.V., Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Ikonnikov A.V., Research Assistant All-Russian Research Institute of Legumes and Groat Crops, Orel City, Russia E-mail: info@vniizbk.ru Chuvasheva E.S., Candidate of Biological Sciences Orel State University, Orel City, Russia Kirsanova E.V., Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Dmitrieva E.A., Post-graduate Student Amelin A.V., Doctor of Agricultural Sciences Orel State Agrarian University, Orel City, Russia ABSTRACT In the review the lentil role as the most valuable pulse crop for consumers is shown. It is noticed that biochemical structure of lentil grain leads it to the class of irreplaceable dietary products used both in daily ration, and in medical, children's and vegetarian food. Directions of biofortification and consumer diversification of crop are specified. KEY WORDS Lentil; Crop; Biochemical structure; Biofortification; Consumer diversification; Breeding; Varieties. Lentil (Lens culinaris subsp. сulinaris) is one of the most popular grain legumes, demand or it is continuously increasing. The increase of lentil consumption is considerably ahead of the relative growth of the world population. In 1960-s lentil world production corresponded to about 1 mln tons at the population of 3,3 bln people. Now 6,7 bln people live on the Earth who produce and consume about 4 mln tons of lentil. This kind of condition is not typical for the majority of other leguminous crops. It is supposed that by 2030 lentil consumption will be doubled [55]. The main lentil producers are Canada (1947 thous. t), India (900 thous. t) and Turkey (447,4 thous. t) [36]. Russia being at the beginning of the ХХ century the world leader in this crop grain production, in 2010 occupied only 17th place and mostly due to the cultivated area reduction. Their maximum decrease was marked in the last ten years of the ХХ century. At present lentil sowing in the country occupy altogether 6…11 thous. ha. The main reason of the real situation is low economic efficiency of production. That is why it is necessary to understand what market potential the crop has and what perspectives are to be realized in the conditions of Russia Agro Industrial Complex. This article is devoted to the reference data analysis and the results of research of lentil grain performance in the aspect of its biofortification and diversification. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Lentil is one of the first domesticated crops. Its cultivation is connected with the beginning of so called “agricultural revolution”, took place about 10000 years ago in the Middle East [33]. The most ancient findings of the wild growing lentil remnants are found in settlement Mureybit (Syria), domesticated forms are found in the Neolithic age layers in Turkey [37]. Alo together with colleagues [29] on the basis of PCR-analysis of 308 species from collection ICARDA, presenting all seven taxons of family Lens, determined that the factual area of domesticated lentil appearance can be South Turkey. The maximum variety of wild growing species and primitive domesticated forms are typical for these territories. They
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».