MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2434361830

Room for a view: I witness

2002· article· en· W2434361830 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alan Peterkin

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueMental Health and Patient Involvement
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNothingMedicinePhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Five-thirty a.m. I answer a stat page to the emergency department. Peering down the long row of curtained gurneys as I enter, I see a steady flow of nurses and physicians going in and out of one in particular. At the end of the gurney, protruding from the curtain, I also see well-muscled calves, feet wearing high-tech running shoes. What has happened is easy to surmise: an early-morning heart attack, followed by cardiac arrest. I am correct. The EKG strips all show ventricular fibrillation, which has already proven resistant to three countershocks and high doses of lidocaine. The amplitude of the fibrillations steadily decreases as, for the next 20 minutes, the drill continues: bretylium, amiodarone, epinephrine, compressions and ventilations. Repeat. The rhythm of the code is continuous and steady, but the rhythm of the heart, it becomes apparent, is now gone forever. Near the end, the man's spouse — unable any longer to stand this waiting, the painted cinderblock walls of the family room closing in, perhaps — enters, accompanied by a nurse. I want to be with him, she proclaims through tears, finding a seat in the corner. I continue to feel for a femoral pulse, but perhaps she, not I, should lay her hand upon this warm body. She watches from the corner. Finally, when there is nothing more to do, nothing more that has not already been done many times, when it becomes clear that all I have left to treat is the body of a man who has died, the code is called. The woman stays with her husband's body, and I go to tell their adolescent children that their father has died. They stop me in the doorway, before I can enter, before I can sit down with them, their eyes and their voices arresting my progress, their eyes and their voices quavering with grief and fear that I know I cannot relieve. I stand at midpoint in the doorway, half in, half out. Words tumble from my mouth, words that pour into the room with the deadly weight of quicksilver, words that will weigh upon them so heavily for the rest of their lives, words that soon trail off into mere vibrations devoid of meaning. I am so sorry. I am so sorry, we did everything we could … They hold each other, dissolving in shared tears of anguish. My words spoken, I feel myself disappear from their consciousness. I wait. Half in, half out of the room and their world, I wait to know what to do next, I wait for some measure of certainty. I go to step back, and then check myself. I cannot and should not leave. I lean forward, and stop. To what end will I enter? I sense above me the doorway bisecting my two limited choices. Neither seems adequate. One step back into the corridor and I will be back in my world, a busy medical world filled with new problems to solve and new patients to treat. One step back and I will be gone forever, an elusive figure who appeared briefly in a doorway. One step forward and I will be in their room, in their world of grief. I can see nothing that my presence in the room would or could add. I wait in this state of limbo, watching their grief, which my gaze does not penetrate. They are alone as I watch. And as I wait I realize that my task is to move neither forward nor back but to pursue a third option: simply to witness this family's suffering, this love for their father and compassion for one another. I can do nothing more, other than write these words, with which I hope have honoured what I witnessed that day in the doorway. Stephen Workman General Internist Halifax, NS

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,645
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,507

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,6450,377

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,123
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Même sujetMental Health and Patient Involvement→Travaux en français237 207→