Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study starts from a thesis that Margaret Atwood is a serious thinker whose writing reflects the imprints of her Canadian background and her general outlook toward life and the world. Further, her analysis of Canadian thematic motifs in Survival can serve as a starting point for us to approach her mind as a general whole which contributes to better comprehending her novels. The theoretical part of this study comprises Atwood’s important ideas presented not only in Survival but also in her other nonfiction books, articles, and interviews. There are five chapters in this dissertation. Chapter One provides a general profile of Atwood, the major ideas, methodology, characteristics, and objectives of her analyses in Survival, and then briefly explains the arrangement of major arguments in the following chapters. Chapter Two focuses on Atwood’s ecological and pantheist concerns. It starts from the Canadian settlement theme and the non-binary mentality in Atwood’s pantheism. The author then extends the discussion to relevant topics such as the close relations among religion, truth/reality, science, and fiction. Chapter Three centers on Atwood’s nationalist concerns and her overall political attitudes. My discussion starts from Atwood’s analyses of typical American and Canadian mindsets as reflected in animal stories and of the historical aspects of the formation of these two mindsets. This chapter also explores Atwood’s subtle political attitudes in her cultural nationalism, as well as toward feminism, theocracy, and atheism. Chapter Four orients around Atwood’s socio-cultural concerns in relation to victimization and the role of the artist in particular. It begins with her analysis of the Canadian motifs family-as-trap and the paralyzed artist, and her exploration on the causes of the entrapment/paralysis. Atwood’s analysis accentuates the political significance of writing as a social means for consciousness-raising. The author then discusses Atwood’s more sophisticated speculations on the tension between writing/art and social responsibility, and on the temptations from the market which could threaten the artist’s survival and challenge his conscience. In each of the three main chapters, after illustrating the theoretical part, the author reads Atwood’s Surfacing and Oryx and Crake within the theoretic framework to demonstrate their close connections. The last chapter (Chapter Five) of this study proposes some further speculations on Atwood’s humanism. The major objective is to distinguish her humanism, especially her pantheism, from some major traits in English Romanticism and American Transcendentalism to foreground its uniqueness and the influence of her Canadian background. After that, the author cites some examples from Oryx and Crake to demonstrate the belief that to grasp Atwood’s main ideas as a theoretical system can contribute to better comprehending not only her mind as a whole but also some textual complexities in her literary presentations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,015 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».