Early Management of Children with Foetal Alcohol Syndrome in France
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTIONDespite its status in France as a legal culturally well accepted drug, alcohol is clearly the most dangerous addictive product for the foetuses. Moderate-to-high alcohol intake during pregnancy can be responsible for a variety of more-or-less complete malformations and dysmorphic anomalies, pre and postnatal growth retardation, and severe neurological and behavioural developmental disorders,1 which, depending on their severity, are classified under the foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) or the foetal alcohol syndrome disorders (FASD) in accordance with the criteria in use at the time of our examination as defined by the American Institute of Medicine2 revised in 2000.3,4Perinatal management of infants born to alcohol-abusing mothers and their families is difficult. We evaluated 11 children suffering from foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) or foetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). In the region of Upper Normandy in France alcohol consumption is particularly prevalent and at least 3/1000 newborns have obvious signs of prenatal alcohol exposure and are diagnosed with FAS.5 In France, the incidence of FAS varies between 1 and 1.3/1000 births versus 5.83 and 8/1000 births for FASD .6,7 For comparison, the incidence of FAS varies between 0.3 and 1.5/1000 births in Norway,8 0.3 and 4.8/1000 births in the United States,9 0.02 and 2.76/1000 births in West Australia,10 1.0 and 3/1000 births in industrialized countries.11,12 According to the Canadian Pediatric Society, in the world this incidence would be 1.9/1000 births. In addition to the possible physical handicaps, FAS is usually responsible for central nervous system disorders, intellectual incapacities and social, professional and familial inaptitudes.13 The association between the physiological involvement and social handicaps seems rather obvious.The future of these children is severely impaired. Attenuating the handicaps and disturbances associated with FAS/FASD requires early and intensive management in medical departments or specialized centres which today are still too few.SUBJECTS AND METHODSThe paediatric medical files of FAS/FASD children followed in French Centres d'Action Medico-Social Precoce (CAMSP, Centres for Early Medical-Social Intervention) between 2000 and 2005 were identified in the database of a university hospital neonatology department. These files were retrospectively analyzed by comparing different criteria (weight, length and head circumference at birth, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), weeks of amenorrhea, etc.) concerning the 11 FAS/FASD newborns. When available, the mothers' obstetrical files were also analyzed. Finally, to retrace the itineraries of these children after their discharge from the neonatology department, questionnaire-oriented interviews were conducted by the CAMSP director.RESULTSCharacteristics of the MothersThe sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics of the mothers of the 11 FAS/FASD children are given in Table 1 . The women, self-declared or presumed excessive alcohol consumers, lived in rather difficult socioeconomic conditions. These women were married and usually financially dependent on their partners, who were often alcohol abusers themselves, rarely had a professional activity, and they lived in their own housing (Table 1). During the prenatal consultations to monitor their pregnancies, almost all the women interviewed declared having no professional activity, (versus 34% in the French general population), with six women unemployed and four staying at home (Table 1).These women had a mean of more than 3 children (Table 1). Their mean age at the time of the pregnancy was higher than the age of the French female population described by the 2003 national inquiry.14 Primipara mothers represented only 18% (2/11) of this population, while for 45% (5/11) of them this was the fourth child. The total number of pregnancies was slightly higher than the number of babies (Table 1), as it included abortions and miscarriages. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».