The Leonard Peltier Case: An Argument in Support of Executive Clemency Based on Norms of International Human Rights
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
vehicle in which Eagle had purportedly left in the day before remains in controversy. 21 Shortly thereafter, a firefight ensued and both agents were killed along with AIM member, Joe Stuntz. 22 Coler and Williams had communicated by radio that they were following the vehicle, were being shot at, and subsequently, were needing assistance. 23 As other agents arrived on the scene, they encountered fire and had to retreat. 24 Additional agents and BIA officers arrived throughout the afternoon.With the help of a local, they were able to negotiate a cease-fire and make it to the dead agents' cars. 25 After negotiations, the officers began an assault on the compound with tear gas; however, the buildings were empty because the remaining AIM shooters were in the hills about a quarter-mile away. 26 By dusk the FBI had secured the Jumping Bull Compound, and the AIM members involved in the firefight had fled. 27 Ultimately four AIM members--Bob Robideau, Dino Butler, Jimmy Eagle, and Leonard Peltier--were indicted for the agents' murders.Robideau and Butler were tried together in federal court in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.The defendants argued self-defense and were acquitted in July 1976. 28 Charges were eventually dropped against Eagle when it became clear he was not present at the firefight. 29 Peltier fled to Canada in February 1976, where he was subsequently arrested and held. 30 The U.S. government successfully extradited him back to the United States, in part by using affidavits by Myrtle Poor Bear, an Indian woman who claimed to have witnessed the firefights. 31 After a five and a half week trial in the federal district court of Fargo, North Dakota, he was found guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and sentenced to two consecutive life sentences. 32 The trial was complex and contentious, with both the prosecution and the defense making claims that various actions during trial were prejudicial.The inconsistencies and evidence of government misconduct will be 21.Id. at 42, 44.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».