MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2461719129 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.5248.5248

Barriers To Diagnosis In Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

2013· article· en· W2461719129 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Raymond H. L. Yip, Lynda Foltz

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineReferralPolycythemia veraAbnormalityDemographicsPediatricsInternal medicineMyelofibrosisEssential thrombocythemiaSurgeryFamily medicineBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Timely diagnosis of patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) is important given the risks of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, disease progression and associated symptoms. Pts often present initially to primary care physicians, who may have limited previous experience with PV/ET given the low prevalence. Little is known about the timeliness of referral or diagnostic testing after identification of abnormal blood test results or if delays in diagnosis affect patient outcomes. Objectives To determine the time from initial lab abnormality to referral, diagnosis and treatment of pts with PV and ET. Methods Pts at a single Canadian academic institution newly diagnosed with PV or ET from Jan 2010 to May 2013 were identified. Retrospective data was collected including demographics, lab values, diagnostic testing and treatments. Results Demographics: 26 pts with PV and 34 with ET were identified. Median age was 67.5 (44-89) y for PV and 66.5 (34-92) y for ET. Delay in Referral and Diagnosis: 98% of pts were referred directly to a hematologist by their primary care physician. 69% of PV pts were referred within 30 days and 92% within 90 days of initial lab abnormality. Median time from referral to diagnosis was 98 (0-221) days. 41% of ET pts were referred within 30 days and 56% within 90 days of initial lab abnormality. Median time from referral to diagnosis was 121 (8-638) days. PV pts were referred sooner, median 20 (0-187) days, than ET pts, median 67 (0-3743) days (p=0.01). The median delay from referral until hematology assessment was 51 days for PV compared to 78 days for ET (p=0.08). After assessment by the hematologist, it required a median of 35 days to make a diagnosis of PV and 25 days for a diagnosis of ET (p=0.31). Referrals by platelet (plt) count: There was a trend to earlier referral of ET pts with higher platelet (plt) counts. 15/20 (75%) ET pts with plt count >600 were referred within 90 days of initial lab abnormality whereas only 4/14 (29%) of pts with plt count 450-600 were referred within 90 days (p=0.056). Treatment of PV pts: 22/26 (85%) pts received phlebotomy at or after referral at the direction of a hematologist. Average delay in referral (and phlebotomy initiation) for patients treated with phlebotomy was 32 days. 13/26 (50%) pts were initiated on treatment with hydroxyurea within 2 months of diagnosis. Average delay in diagnosis (and hydroxyurea initiation) in this subgroup was 142 days. 11/26 (42%) pts were receiving ASA prior to the initial hematological consultation. 12/26 (46%) were initiated on ASA at or shortly after hematological consultation. Average delay to hematology consultation (and ASA initiation) was 90 days in this subgroup. Treatment of ET pts: 8/34 (24%) pts were initiated on treatment with hydroxyurea within 2 months of diagnosis. Average delay in diagnosis (and hydroxyurea initiation) in this subgroup was 790 days. 17/34 (50%) pts were receiving ASA prior to the initial hematological consultation. 15/34 (44%) were initiated on ASA at or shortly after hematological consultation. Average delay to hematology consultation (and ASA initiation) was 355 days in this subgroup. No thrombotic or major hemorrhagic complications occurred in any PV/ET pts between the time of initial lab abnormality and diagnosis. Discussion This study demonstrates the marked variability in time from lab abnormality to referral and diagnosis for PV/ET pts. Primary care providers were more likely to promptly refer PV pts than ET pts, and particularly tended to overlook referral and investigation of pts with modestly elevated plt counts of 450-600. This is a concern, as risk of thrombosis in ET pts is independent of plt count. Delays were also apparent in wait times for hematology appointments and subsequent diagnostic tests. The delay in diagnosis led to a delay in initiation of therapy to reduce risk of thrombosis in both PV and ET pts. Possible strategies to expedite diagnosis include targeted education of primary care physicians focusing on identification of lab features of PV/ET. Directive comments on lab reports by community hematopathologists may also facilitate prompt referral and investigation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,275
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,547

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,029
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207