Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dr Judith G Hall It is a challenge to distill 70 years of experience, but I like challenges, so here are seven thoughts: Listen. Listen carefully to parents, to children, to younger colleagues and to the questions of students. Listen because people often say a lot in between the words. Listen because the words don't always mean what they say. Listen because you can't learn when you are talking. Listen with all five senses so that you are immersed in the experience and can remember the essence afterwards. Know what you know and what you do not know. As a medical student, I remember the Dean telling us that 80% of what we would be learning in medical school would be obsolete in 10 years. Somewhere, I heard that a great pundit once said, “it is the right formulation of the question that leads to new knowledge”. Thus, it is very important to be clear about which things are true and which are partial truths – and one must readjust and modify when new ideas and information come along. Be present. Recognize the individuality and the uniqueness that presents itself to you everyday. As a geneticist, I have come to appreciate that every individual – genetically speaking – is totally unique (including monozygotic twins – thousands of different somatic mutations occur in each as they develop); thus, you can only draw generalizations from previous experiences, from your own experience and from what the textbooks tell you. The role of the creative paediatrician is to look for the best alternatives for each unique person, in a unique family, with a unique history, and always present several options for them to choose from. It is easy to say that you should balance your life, but it is very difficult to do. The longer that one is around, the more you appreciate how important family is, friends are and children are. I often say to a family with a ‘special child’, “Take stock each year. You may have done a terrific job during the past year, but there are always things to consider, and to work on in the coming year”. These things may include their marriage, their normal child, the change of a teacher or a school. Each of us has the same questions: How is my life balancing out? Which things have I neglected? Which things have I enjoyed? Of which things can I be proud? What do I need to work on more in the coming year? Take time – on your birthday, at New Year's or as the academic year begins in the autumn after Labour Day – to reflect on balance and on what has transpired in the past year so that you can readjust your priorities during the coming year. We all have multiple mentors for different aspects of our lives. The art of medicine is similar to an apprenticeship in which you learn by observing, by trying out and by accumulating experiences. When we see that someone has done a great job in a certain dimension of their life, we naturally want to try to emulate it. However, everyone is human, and other parts of their life may need some ‘dusting off’. No one is perfect and everyone has parts of their life that shine. So, have many mentors for the different aspects of your unique self. And, of course, things change over time so it is necessary to keep readjusting priorities and mentors – ‘take stock at least once a year’. In the olden days, sabbaticals were invented by very wise men (they probably were men because women had a different role in those days). Sabbaticals reflect the realities of life that approximately every seven years, things become routine or habit, and we get lazy – or maybe it is just that we become uninspired by what used to be exciting. Therefore, we need a way to find a new challenge, a new focus. In this ‘modern’ life, it is often difficult to take a sabbatical, to take time for reflection, to take time to develop new interests and to learn something new. Consequently, it is even more important for each of us to really ‘take stock’ every seven years. In other words, even if we can't take a sabbatical, everyone and every couple can take a weekend or a week away for reflection and realignment. Don't put yourself onto any irrevocable paths if you can help it. Whether it is in an argument with your partner, by stopping your violin practice or by narrowing or limiting the focus of your practice, keep your options open. So much in life and medicine changes over time. So much in life changes with aging. So, although you may not be able to keep up with the details, just keep your options open and maintain a broad perspective. The lovely thing about aging is that you tend to see the ‘big picture’ as long as you keep your eyes open, have a sense of humour, and continue to be able to feel humility and awe. Dr Judith G Hall is a clinical geneticist and paediatrician. She trained in the United States at Wellesley College (Wellesley, Massachusetts), the University of Washington School of Medicine (Seattle, Washington) and Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland). She is presently Professor Emerita of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics at the University of British Columbia based at Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia in Vancouver. She was Chair of Pediatrics at the University of British Columbia from 1990 to 2000. In paediatrics, she became involved in paediatric education, health care delivery for children, child advocacy issues, gender issues, international paediatric health and paediatric physician resource planning. Her research interests are in the areas of human congenital anomalies, mechanisms of disease, the natural history of genetic disorders, arthrogryposis and monozygotic twins. She has described many new syndromes and the natural history of many disorders. She has published more than 300 original articles, 145 chapters and sections of conference proceedings, and seven books. She has been Vice President of the Society for Pediatric Research, and President of the Western Society for Pediatric Research, the American Society of Human Genetics and the American Pediatric Society. She has been on the Boards or Councils of the Gairdner Foundation, the Medical Research Council of Canada, the International Federation of Human Genetics, both the American and Canadian Children's Miracle Networks, the Vancouver Foundation, the International Pediatric Association, and Genome Canada. She has been one of the Science and Technology Advisors for the government of Canada, chaired the Science Advisory Board of Health Canada and is on the Science Advisory Board of the Council of Canadian Academies. She is a founding member of the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences and is responsible for its first assessment. She has received many awards including a lifetime membership in the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Alan Ross Award from the Canadian Paediatric Society. She was made an Officer of the Order of Canada in 1998.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,023 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,089 | 0,056 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».