Update On The Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Of Momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor, For The Treatment Of Myelofibrosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Momelotinib (MMB, GS-0387, CYT387) is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Preliminary results of a phase I/II core study (n=166) were previously reported. Subjects who achieved at least stable disease in the core study could continue MMB treatment in an extension study (n=120). Final data from the phase I/II core study and updated data from the extension study are presented. Methods Subjects with myelofibrosis categorized as IPSS intermediate-2 or high risk, or intermediate-1 risk with symptomatic splenomegaly or hepatomegaly and/or unresponsive to available therapy, were enrolled. Following a dose escalation phase, subjects were treated on a dose expansion phase in the core study with MMB at either 150 mg or 300 mg once-daily, or 150 mg twice-daily for 9 months. In the extension study, MMB was at the same dose the subject tolerated and derived clinical benefit from in the core study. Clinical responses were adjudicated according to IWG-MRT criteria. Spleen Response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly that lasted ≥ 8 weeks (wks) for baseline splenomegaly ≥ 10 cm, plus resolution of palpable splenomegaly that lasted ≥ 8 wks for baseline splenomegaly > 5 to < 10 cm. Anemia Response was defined as transfusion-free interval of ≥ 12 wks for baseline transfusion dependence, plus ≥ 2 g/dL rise in hemoglobin (Hb) for baseline transfusion independence and Hb < 10 g/dL. Baseline transfusion dependence was defined as ≥ 2U RBC transfusion in the 30 days prior to first dose of MMB or identified as transfusion dependent in medical history. Results As of April 2013, 58 of 120 subjects remained on treatment in the open-label extension study, with median treatment duration of 507 days (range 23-1036) for both core and extension studies. Based on interim analysis, the most common reasons for discontinuation from the extension study were disease progression (n=13), investigator's decision (n=12), and consent withdrawal (n=10), with 2 drug-related adverse events (both peripheral neuropathy) that led to study discontinuation. Efficacy data for the core and extension studies are depicted in table below. Median time to onset of Spleen Response was not yet reached (range 6-693 days), median duration of Spleen Response was 324 days (range 56-936). Median duration of 12-week transfusion independence was not yet reached (91-987 days), median duration of Anemia Response was not yet reached (57-987). Constitutional symptoms assessment at 3 months for the core study showed ≥ 50% improvement in 72%, 46%, 77%, 100%, and 74% of subjects with pruritis, cough, bone pain, fever, and night sweats respectively. Most common Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related events were thrombocytopenia (29%), neutropenia (5%), and elevated lipase (4%) without clinical pancreatitis. Peripheral neuropathy was reported by 38% of subjects, all ≤ Grade 2, with 17 subjects experiencing neuropathy at baseline. Four subjects transformed into acute leukemia (1 in core study, 3 in extension study). There was no treatment-related death. Conclusion Prolonged administration of MMB for treatment of myelofibrosis is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile. MMB is efficacious in durably reducing myelofibrosis-related splenomegaly as well as improving transfusion requirement and disease-related symptoms. These data form the basis for the phase 3 randomized study of MMB in myelofibrosis. Disclosures: Gupta: Novartis: Lecture fee, Lecture fee Other; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Bavisotto:YM Biosciences: Consultancy. Kawashima:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Lee:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Kowalski:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Deng:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Niforos:Gilead Sciences: Employment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».