MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2464441099

Research Note: Religion and Work in Post-War North America: Mennonite Responses to Labor Activism, 1945-1995

2010· review· en· W2464441099 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janis Thiessen

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2010
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture and Farm Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAgrarian societyGender studiesPolitical radicalismSociologyLabor historyProtestantismPolitical scienceHistoryPoliticsLabor relationsLawAgriculture
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Labor history has been invigorated over the last generation through the study of the cultural dimensions of work, and the intersection of race, gender, ethnicity and linguistics with worker identity. Religion, for all its current attention in both Canada and the United States, has had comparatively little impact on the fields of North American labor and working class history. While the radical component (e.g., social gospel, Christian socialist) has been studied, religious traditions that conflicted with organized or radicalized labor have received less attention. Over the next two years, with the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Canada), I will investigate how ethno-religious identity informed and was shaped dialectically by the culture of work. While various social groups could be an appropriate focus for such a study, the Mennonites offer a particularly rich avenue of research. Given their proximity to agrarian rural life, the value they placed on independent farm families, and their teachings on pacifism and nonconformity, a comparative study of the Mennonites' interaction with labor radicalism in Canada and the United States will deepen understandings of both labor and religion. Although Mennonites are typically associated with rural life, in the post-1945 period, they became increasingly urbanized and were involved as workers in specific locations in both traditional Mennonite enclaves in Ohio, Indiana, Ontario and Manitoba, and those to which they migrated in the twentieth century, such as British Columbia and California. Mennonites in these locales found employment both as field workers for large agricultural operations and as factory hands in major manufacturing firms. The postwar experiences of North American Mennonites in these locales caused them to confront and reassess their understandings of labor and religion. A comparative study of these Mennonite workers, ostensibly united by a common ethnic and religious identity, and yet shaped in distinct ways by their differing geographic locations, immigration histories and cultural contexts, should make a contribution to both the history of labor and the history of religion in North America. A major part of the research base for this project will be interviews. The interviews will be an opportunity to explore the attitudes and actions of Mennonites of all ages: those old enough to have participated in or resisted various labor issues of the post-1945 period, as well as their descendants. I intend to examine the means by which the religious commitments of interviewees shaped their perspectives on labor issues, the manner in which their class position influenced their religious beliefs, and the ways in which their understandings of religion and labor have changed over time. Differences in age, gender, national origin, migration history, church conference affiliation, educational background and class position will be investigated. The interpretation of these interviews and the relations among Mennonites and between Mennonites and secular society will draw on insights from oral history theory, memory theory and discourse analysis, as exemplified by the works of Alessandro Portelli, Alon Confino, Michael Frisch, Jacques LeGoff and others. Interview subjects will be identified in six cities: Winnipeg, Manitoba; Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario; Vancouver, British Columbia; Bluffton, Ohio; Goshen, Indiana; and Reedley, California. Notices have been placed in relevant North American Mennonite periodicals and in the offices of the Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches, the United States Conference of Mennonite Brethren, Mennonite Church Canada and Mennonite Church USA. In addition, I will consult relevant Mennonite Church archival sources, the archives of various labor and union associations (including the Christian Labour Association of Canada), and articles and letters to the editor in the North American Mennonite popular press on these themes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,997
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewMême sujetAgriculture and Farm SafetyTravaux en français237 207