Assessment for Reading Instruction, 3rd edition
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Assessment for Reading Instruction, 3rd edition by Michael C. McKenna & Katherine A. Dougherty Stahl New York, NY/USA: The Guilford Press, 2015, 324 pages ISBN: 978-1-4625-2104-3 (paperback) As increasing emphasis is placed on the importance of literacy skills, many classroom teachers feel overwhelmed or left behind. Classrooms that exceed student capacity, readers who find themselves well below grade level standards, and government mandates that tie student success to teacher success have placed a tremendous amount of pressure on classroom teachers. With a wide variety of readers and reading levels in one classroom, teachers are often spread too thin and find themselves in need of practical information and tools that will help them advance their students' reading levels. Michael C. McKenna and Katherine A. Dougherty Stahl have created a practical and comprehensive text that covers reading assessment and that gives teachers a wealth of useful knowledge that can be applied directly to their classroom experience. It is clear, concise, and offers real-world examples that will prove invaluable to teachers. The third edition of Assessment for Reading Instruction obviously builds upon the previous two, but within the last six years, several topics have become more prominent in the field of literacy education. Among the most important is the use of response to intervention (RTI) as it relates to literacy education. McKenna and Stahl have written a companion book entitled Reading Assessment in an RTI Framework that describes how key assessments fit into the response to intervention (RTI) model (McKenna & Stahl, 2013). This text is meant to work hand in hand with Assessment for Reading Instruction. The ever-evolving national focus on Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the United States is another reason the authors included vital information to their Assessment for Reading Instruction text. With many regions adopting the CCSS or a similar version of it, the realization that vast numbers of students are below grade level readers has flustered educators. There is no one chapter dedicated to Common Core within this text. However, there are CCSS connections within many of the tips, skill sets, and assessments included. Finally, this text includes a chapter that focuses exclusively on vocabulary, its importance, how it can be assessed, and the issues that cause it to be problematic. The text is divided into eleven chapters. It begins with a basic introduction of reading assessment in which multiple reading models are detailed. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle