INTERVIEW WITH H. GRAFF & B. STREET
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You've developed your inaugural works almost at the same time -the 1970's -, although in different perspectives, historical and anthropological.The results of your works, to the 19 th century in Canada [The Literacy Myth: Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century (1979, 1991), by Harvey J. Graff] or for the 70's in Iran [Literacy in Theory and Practice (1984), by Brian Street], had great impact in the literacy studies' field.Both helped to overcome the first generation of studies, such as Jack Goody and Eric Havelock's works, by putting literacy as a phenomenon that can only be understood in context.Your studies also helped not dichotomize orality and writing and to understand that literacy is not always related to the individual or social progress.In this sense, the concepts of literacy myth and the autonomous versus ideological models have, for scholars who came after you, great relationships.For us, you would be seen then as two leading researchers of a generation that would change the face of literacy studies.How do you see this relationship between your works today?At the time you developed them, did you have this awareness that they were making a revolution in the field of literacy studies?This is our first question. Harvey Graff:The Literacy Myth was a historical conjuncture.It reflects the coming together of several currents of the post-World War II period, but in particular developments of the 1960's.First of all, it was shaped by my own growing up.I remember very well the politics of the 1960's.In fact, I have never eaten grapes since I boycotted grapes with Cesar Chavez 1 in the 1960's.I protested against Vietnam, I marched for civil rights.My teachers, particularly in the university, were very encouraging of crossing different fields of study, of being critical, and by being critical the lasting legacy for me was always asking questions.I was taught that good questions are more important than answers.Answers are temporary.So part of the politics and civil rights struggle was the rediscovery that for many young people schools were failing.They were not taught either a basic literacy or higher levels of abilities to use literacy (or multiple literacies).This is true for many students (in the United States but not only in the U.S.), particularly minority students, but also for students from the middle class as well.So together, the radical politics, the protests and the discovery of the problems in school shaped me and my scholarship.The key people I read in those days were Jonathan Kozol 2 , and I think his first book, Death at an Early Age, was his best work, long before we were aware of the Cuban style literacy campaigns or the work of Paulo Freire, which was another influence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».