Outcome of Down Syndrome (DS) Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplasia (MDS) Treated with a Uniform Prospective Clinical Trial - Initial Report of the COG Trial A2971.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract DS children with AML have a superior outcome as compared to nonDS children with AML. For COG A2971, etoposide, dexamethasone, & the 3 month maintenance course from the standard timing DCTER regimen used in the prior CCG 2891 trial, were eliminated. From 1999–2003, A2971 enrolled 130 DS patients(pts) with AML(n= 86) or MDS(N=44). Median followup was 1253 days (290 – 2140). Sixteen pts had previously been enrolled in this trial’s TMD (transient myeloproliferative disorder) arm & transferred to this treatment arm when they later developed AML or MDS. Induction consisted of 2 courses(IND C1 & C2) of 2 cycles each of thioguanine PO, with AraC & daunomycin by 96 hour infusion(CI-TAD). Consolidation(CON) followed with intensively timed high dose AraC & L-asparaginase followed by IT AraC weekly ×3. Median age at diagnosis was 1.6 years (y) (0.3–13.6) with 85 in the 0–2y group, 39 ages 2–4y, & 6 over 4y of age. Median CBC values: WBC: 6,200 (900–164,900), hgb: 9 (2.5–16.8), & platelets: 29,000 (2,000–325,000). No patient had CNS disease at diagnosis or relapse. Induction remission was evaluable in 108 pts. CR & PR were achieved in 84% & 8%, progressive disease occurred in 6.5%, and there was one death during induction(p=NS vs 2891). At least one non-hematologic toxicity was reported in 55%, 29%, and 54% of pts during IND C1, IND C2, and CON, respectively. The following toxicities were seen respectively in IND 1, IND 2, CON: mucositis 7%, 0%, & 10%; infectious complications including neutropenic fever without an identified organism 42%, 20%, 42%; hyperglycemia 7%, 0%, 5%; pulmonary 9%, 3%, 7%. There were no clinically significant differences in toxicity between 2891 & A2971 trials. Among all pts, 3y OS was 84%(vs 80% in 2891), EFS was 79%(vs 77%), TRM was 3%(vs 4%), & DFS(from CR) was 90%(vs 85%). In CCG 2891, increasing age was an adverse risk factor. By age groups 0–2, 2–4, & >4y, A2971 3y OS was 89, 82, & 33%, 3y EFS was 83, 79, & 33%, & DFS was 91, 92, & 33%, respectively(ages 0–2 vs 2–4y, all p=NS, except OS trend: p=.007). In CCG 2891, these 3y outcomes by age group were: OS: 86, 75, & 42%; EFS: 86, 68, & 33%; and DFS: 92, 81, & 43%. Improvements in survival were seen between trials, particularly in the 2–4 yo’s, but none were statistically significant when compared by age cohorts. Among the 16 previously enrolled with TMD, median age at AML/MDS diagnosis was 1.0 y and all achieved CR. Fourteen were diagnosed before age 2y & had similar diagnostic findings and outcomes to newly diagnosed pts of similar age(p=NS). This report shows that the elimination of 2 agents and maintenance was achieved without a decrease in survival. Age as an adverse risk factor persisted though with less impact in the 2 to 4 year old group in this study and failed to consistently reach statistical significance. As OS & EFS remain <90%, upcoming COG studies will focus upon further improving survival in DS children with AML.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».