A Systematic Review On The Use Of Pharmacological Agents In Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant vascular disorder that affects approximately 1 in 5,000 people. Recurrent epistaxis occurs in 90% of adults & chronic GI bleeding in 20%, and when severe may require transfusion support, repeat emergency department visits & admissions for endoscopic/surgical intervention. Use of various systemic & topical agents to reduce bleeding & its associated co-morbidities are highly needed. We conducted a systematic review to determine if the use of pharmacological agents in patients with HHT reduces bleeding, mortality due to bleeding, frequency of transfusion, frequency of hospital admissions/visits, or improved quality of life. Methods We searched MEDLINE & EMBASE from 1946 to February 2013 for medical treatments used to control bleeding (e.g. antifibrinolytics agent, angiogenic inhibitors, estrogen) in patients with HHT. We excluded articles if they were animal studies, case reports, letters, reviews, series with < 5 patients, or not published in English language. We also included conference proceedings published in the last 5 years (2008-2013). Results 2 independent reviewers assessed 414 citations. Of these, 21 nonrandomized trials (15 prospective & 6 retrospective) & 4 randomized controlled trials (RCT) met our criteria for inclusion. From 25 trials reviewed, 21 had sample sizes fewer than 50 participants. The spectrum of medical therapy studied included estrogens, antiestrogens, antifibrinolytics & angiogenesis inhibitors: Bevacizumab was the most evaluated agent (10 trials) followed by hormonal therapy (9 trials). Measured outcomes included the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS), change in hemoglobin concentration (Hb), the Sadick scale score (a scale evaluating amount & frequency of epistaxis), intensity & frequency of bleeding, hemorrhage free time, & quality of life (QoL). The metrics used to evaluate outcomes were heterogeneous across the studies & therefore a meta-analysis was not performed on available data. When using Bevacizumab, ESS scores (reported in 5 of 10 trials) significantly improved in 4 trials (mean ranges pre intervention: 6-8.12 vs. post intervention: 2.82-3.6) while Hb levels (reported in 4 of 10 trials) showed significant improvement in 3 trials (mean ranges pre-intervention: 85-106 g/L vs. post intervention: 97-130 g/L). QoL (reported in 4 of 10 trials), was reported to be improved in 3 trials. Hormonal therapy was also effective. Topical hormonal therapy combined with Argon plasma coagulation (APC) showed significant efficacy in 2 trials. Decreased intensity of bleeding (67-71% of patients converted from grade 3 to grade 1) & frequency of bleeding (68-69% of patients converted from grade 3 to grade 1) were reported. Oral estrogen & tranexamic acid trials yielded mixed results. On the other hand, a prospective trial using raloxifine showed improvement in Sadick scale score (Mean Frequency: pre 2.36, post 1.13, Mean Quantity: pre 2.26, post 1.42), & a rise in hemoglobin of 9.25 % (before treatment 11.18 ± 0.10, after treatment 12.08 ± 0.15). Tamoxifen therapy showed a significant improvement in severity & frequency of epistaxis in a RCT & an additional observational trial showed improvement in epistaxis bleeding score, hemoglobin & quality of life. Side effects (SE) were reported in 13 trials. Topical Bevacizumab alone had no side effects (3 out 4 trials reported SE), however when combined with laser treatment in high doses, 40% of patients developed septal perforation in one trial. Side effects were seen in 84% of patients receiving IV Bevacizumab, most common SE were headache (58% of events), nausea & vomiting (13% of events). 3 trials that used oral estrogen reported vaginal bleeding (10-50%) & gynecomastia/breast engorgement (33-47%). No thromboembolic events were reported. Topical hormonal treatment did not result in side effects although only one trial reported events. Conclusion Bevacizumab, tamoxifen & combined topical hormonal with Argon plasma coagulation therapy appear to be effective in reducing bleeding for patients with HHT. Other agents such raloxifine & thalidomide also showed improvement in outcomes but further studies are needed to evaluate their efficacy. Limitations include a lack of a well-structured RCT, the predominance of small non-randomized trials, & a lack of coherent data reporting on outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».