MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2468775958

Scenes of reading: Australia-Canada-Australia

2016· article· en· W2468775958 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Sneja Gunew

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian Indigenous Culture and History
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)Relation (database)HistoryIndigenousCeltic languagesLiteratureLinguisticsMedia studiesSociologyArtComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I found the idea of a 'scene of writing' very generative and tried to retrieve a few mises en scene in relation to my own obsessions over the past 45 years of teaching both in Australia and Canada. Reading some of the publications coming out of Robert Dixon's project (e.g. Dixon and Rooney) I speculated about how fascinating it would be to track Australian scenes of reading in relation to those writers who came to Australian literary texts with knowledge of languages other than English and with cultural contexts other than Anglo-Celtic ones. After the panel session I launched a kind of Festschrift for a writer who has embodied all this for forty years: Antigone Kefala. The book captures many scenes of reading her work in numerous languages and places across the world (Karalis and Nikas). I also started speculating about the recent work by Kim Scott and many others who have been working to salvage Aboriginal languages and that here too there is an important intervention into a prevailing mono-lingualism that still seems to be the default position in Australia. Paradoxically, the work of indigenous writers and critics may make it easier to argue for more attention to be paid to that intra-cosmopolitanism multilingualism comprising the many writers and artists who have always worked within Australia-sometimes in English or an English inflected differently as well as many many other languages (Chow).Let me draw your attention to two moments in Kim Scott's writing. The first occurs in an essay that comments on That Deadman Dance, published in Overland: Originally, that novel had the working title, Rose a Wail, a (poor) pun on a whale breaking from the ocean surface and the hint of an inarticulate cry of anguish. I wondered about the possibility of conveying a Noongar language sensibility as it emerged in English: would this mean a transformation of the language or an adjustment of the sensibility or, and probably most likely, both? The first word of the novel is an attempt by a Noongar character to render a Noongar word in English spelling; the novel concludes with the central character delivering a speech in Noongar. But even more than this sparse spattering across pages and pages of English, Noongar language influences the imagery, rhythm and characters of the novel. (59) Scott captures exactly what a multilingual writer is able to contribute to English writing in Australia. He also describes the encounter with Noongar country and language elsewhere as tantamount to being 'reshaped from the inside out' (Kayang and Me 257).The generalisations that follow will be outrageously simplistic but here goes. After 20 years of teaching in officially bilingual Canada, the anachronism of Australia's apparent mono-lingualism becomes even more stark. Of course it isn't actually monolingual but the attention paid to its multilingualism has been scant and has not been supported by funding bodies in a sustained manner. One thinks of ARC project assessment comments where researchers into literary multilingualism produced by Australian writers are asked to include expertise from speakers in countries of origin in order to validate their project. One thinks as well of the vulnerability of relevant archives, for example, one set up to actively seek out and collect the papers and books of those from non Anglo-Celtic Australian writers which silently abandoned this aspect of the project in spite of the funding set up to sustain it. So what did scenes of writing conceived within these parameters mean for encounters with Australian texts from the sixties onward? In some respects they comprised anxiously consulted models for assimilation. I agree completely with Lindsay Barrett's interpretation of Nino Culotta's We're A Weird Mob, the product of an Irish-Australian writer posing as an Italian immigrant. That it was such a best seller was undoubtedly due to the fact that it was exactly that-a normative blueprint for assimilation (Barrett). But let's fast forward to a text such as Christos Tsiolkas's Barracuda which captures ocker idioms with astonishing accuracy that include the nuances of ocker English inflected by varieties of other migrant dialects. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,934
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,252

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,006
Communication savante0,0080,002
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Association for the Study of Australian LiteratureMême sujetAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryTravaux en français237 207