Clinical and surgical aspects of treatment of degenerative and traumatic rotator cuff tears
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pain caused by rotator cuff pathology or tear is a major source of discomfort and dysfunction in the shoulder joint. The prevalence of rotator cuff tear increases with age and also as the workforce becomes older. The number of otherwise healthy elderly individuals with high demands on functionality and quality of life in the society is also increasing. A successful rotator cuff repair leads to a good shoulder function, and excellent patient satisfaction however, the failure rate is still considerably high, especially in multi tendon and chronic tears in the elderly, despite the advances in surgical techniques. The overall aim of this thesis was to study factors, which might improve the result of surgical treatment. Study 1) The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the result of surgery after traumatic rotator cuff tear regarding the time delay to surgery after injury. Seventy-three patients (75 shoulders) were retrospectively examined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and functional outcomes at least one year after the surgery. The results were compared in patients who had surgery earlier or later than three months after their injury. No significant difference was found between the groups. The conclusion was that if repair was possible the timing should not impact surgical decision. Study 2) The aim of this validation of outcomes instruments study was to validate the Swedish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) in evaluation of treatment outcome for subacromial disease including rotator cuff tears. In total, 114 patients were included prospectively in this study. The WORC was tested against WOOS, Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant-Murley Score and EQ-5D. The results showed that the Swedish version of WORC was valid, reliable and responsive in evaluation of this group of patients. Study 3) The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to find factors on preoperative MRI prior to rotator cuff surgery, which might predict the outcome. In this study sixty-two pre- and postoperative MRI were compared. The results showed that preoperative tendon retraction of more than 40 mm, muscle atrophy according to Goutallier classification grade 3- 4 might predict a worse surgical outcome, with a fivefold increase in the risk for a re-rupture. A prevention of progression of muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration was found in the successfully repaired shoulders but also an improvement in 8-11% of all the cases. This result favors surgery when a repair is technically possible. Study 4) The aim of this prospective randomized controlled patient-blinded clinical trial with including fifty-eight patients was to investigate whether a synthetic patch might improve the result after rotator cuff surgery. In half of the cases the repair was augmented with a synthetic patch, Artelon®. Assessment was made by serial ultrasound during the first three months post-surgery. There were no differences identified in any of the outcome measures including functional scores and MRI at 12 months follow-up. Based on this result we would not recommend the routine use of a synthetic patch in cuff repair. However, the use of Artelon® was safe and leads to good function and patient satisfaction comparable to the conventional repair. The results out of this thesis support the fact that the timing after traumatic rotator cuff tears is not a considerable factor in decision-making regarding surgical repair. The Swedish version of WORC is reliable and useful in assessing the outcome in subacromial disease including rotator cuff tears. There are findings on preoperative MRI that may predict the result of surgery in rotator cuff repair. The use of Artelon®, a synthetic patch augmentation, in rotator cuff repair is safe but not superior to traditional repair. List of scientific papers I. Similar results comparing early and late surgery in open repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears Soheila Zhaeentan, Anders Von Heijne, Elisabet Hagert, André Stark, Björn Salomonsson, Knee Surg Sports Traumatology Arthrosc. 2015-Nov 12 [E-publication ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3840-0 II. A validation of the Swedish version of the WORC index in the assessment of patients treated by surgery for subacromial disease including rotator cuff syndrome Soheila Zhaeentan, Markus Legeby, Susanne Ahlström, André Stark, Björn Salomonsson, BMC Musculuskeletal Disordorders, 2016, Apr 14;17(1):165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1014-y III. Preoperative MRI-findings indicate the clinical outcome after rotator cuff surgery, a retrospective study of 62 patients Soheila Zhaeentan, Anders Von Heijne, Björn Salomonsson. [Manuscript] IV. Reinforcement with a synthetic patch in rotator cuff surgery fails to improve postoperative cuff integrity and clinical outcomes. A randomized patient blinded controlled study on 58 patients with 12 months follow-up Soheila Zhaeentan, Anders Von Heijne, Anders Elvin, Shwan Khoschnau, Hans Rahme, Björn Salomonsson. [Manuscript]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».